A Comparative Analysis between DCT and JPEG2000 Modules Algorithms

Authors

  • Hassan M. Ibrahim University of Information Technology and Communications, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Mohammed Sh. Majid Department of Computer Engineering, Altinbas University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Ali N. Yousif University of Information Technology and Communications, Baghdad, Iraq

Keywords:

JPEG2000, DCT, VCDemo, Encoder

Abstract

Analysis and comparison Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), and JPEG2000. Both modules were experimented in a bitmap figure in a software called VCDemo, with changing the properties of each module for every experiment. This paper focuses on noting down the comparative analysis with JPEG2000 and DCT. As well as, to make a brief literature review of the latest research works on JPEG2000 and DCT worldwide.

References

T. Sikora, “Trends and Perspectives in Image and Video Coding,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 6–17, 2005.

A. Chouhan and M. J. Nigam, “Double compression of JPEG image using DCT with estimated quality factor,” 1st IEEE Int. Conf. Power Electron. Intell. Control Energy Syst. ICPEICES 2016, pp. 31–33, 2017.

V. Holub and J. Fridrich, “Low-complexity features for JPEG steganalysis using undecimated DCT,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 219–228, 2015.

Q. Fu, X. Zhou, C. Wang, and B. Jiang, “Mathematical Relation between APBT-Based and DCT-Based JPEG Image Compression Schemes,” J. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, 2016.

A. Wu, G. Feng, X. Zhang, and Y. Ren, “Unbalanced JPEG image steganalysis via multiview data match,” J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent., vol. 34, pp. 103–107, 2016.

[V. K. Padmaja, “Literature Review of Image Compression Algorithm,” vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1–6, 2012

Downloads

Published

2022-01-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Comparative Analysis between DCT and JPEG2000 Modules Algorithms. (2022). Texas Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3, 6-10. https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjet/article/view/557