##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 61 Download : 139

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

This study looked into the quality of English instruction in agricultural universities in Uzbekistan. English is a supplemental subject offered in agricultural universities to equip students for global communication issues. Following graduation and post-graduation, students prepare to serve in a variety of local and worldwide organizations and corporations. Because English is the primary medium of communication in the business, English demands additional emphasis in addition to students' subjective skills. Employers frequently advise candidates to improve their English language skills when recruiting. As a result, teaching and mastering English is an important priority for agricultural universities. The researcher focused on many stages of students' academic connection with English in this study, including students' academic competency in English upon admission, needs analysis, syllabus design, course aims as ESP, content quality, hours invested, and assessment.

Keywords

Syllabus design ESP EAP

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Hasanova Shahnoza Zohirovna. (2023). English Teaching in Agricultural Universities. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 21, 43–45. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/zjssh/article/view/4192

References

  1. Allen, P. et al. 1983. The communicative orientation of language teaching: An observation scheme. In: J. Handscombe. et al. (eds.) On TESOL 1983. Washington DC: TESOL.
  2. Brumfit, C. J. 1980. Problems and Principles in English Teaching. England: Pergamon Press Ltd.
  3. Candlin, C. 1984. ‘Syllabus design as a critical process’ in C. J. Brumfit (ed.) 1984a.
  4. Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A. 1987. English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Jordan, R. R. 1997. English for Academic Purposes: A Guide and Resource Book for Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Nunan, D. 1988. Syllabus Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rahnuma, N. 2009. Theory and Practice of Language Teaching: Significance of Needs Analysis in ESP. Harvest, 24(1729-8326), 127-141pp.
  7. Richards, Jack C. and Theodore Stephen Rodgers 1999. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richards, Jack, John Platt, and Heidi Weber. 1985. Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman.
  8. Widdowson, H. G. 1979. Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wikipedia. 2016. English for specific purposes. Retrieved 18 May, 2016, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_for_ specific_purposes.
  9. Wilkins, D. 1976. Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Yalden, J. 1983. The communicative Syllabus: Evolution, Design and Implementation. England: Fergamon Press Ltd.