##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 67 Download : 167

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

This article explains the metonymical meaning of the “Heart” concept in the literary texts and language system. Here given comparative analysis of the concept heart in three languages: English, Uzbek, and Russian. In the article, we looked through the similarities and difference of the “Heart” concept in three languages. The Heart concept is studied by a number of English and Russian scientists. However, there are fewer scientists who carry out research of concept “Heart” in Uzbek language. Here the concept “Heart” is analyzed in three languages.

Keywords

concept conceptual meaning metonymical meaning Idiosyncratic English expressions

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Madaminova Iroda. (2022). Metonymic uses of the concept “Heart” in Uzbek, English Russian. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8, 169–171. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/zjssh/article/view/1792

References

  1. Barcelona, A, “On the systematic contrastive analysis of conceptual metaphors”: case studies and proposed methodology. Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy. – Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2001.280 p
  2. Hilpert, Martin, “Keeping an eye on the data: Metonymies and their Patterns”. Corpora in cognitive linguistics. Vol 1. Metaphor and metonymy. – Berlin Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. – 280 p.
  3. Kövecses, Zoltán, Metaphor and Emotion. Language, Culture and Body in Human Feeling. – Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 185 p.
  4. Kövecses, Zoltán, Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. – Cambridge: CUP, 2005. 58 p.
  5. Kövecses, Zoltán, Metaphor. A practical introduction. – New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. – 150 p.
  6. Lakoff, “The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reasoning based on image-schemas?” Cognitive Linguistics. – Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1990. – 172 p.
  7. Lakoff, George, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. – Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1987. – 152 p.