Myth As A Mechanism Of Othering And The Demonization Of Amir Timur In Early Modern English Literary Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62480/tjpch.2026.vol53.pp58-60Keywords:
Amir Timur, mythAbstract
This article examines myth as a discursive mechanism that constructs “otherness” and contributes to the demonization of Amir Timur in Early Modern English literary discourse. Focusing primarily on Tamburlaine the Great by Christopher Marlowe, the study explores how mythological and symbolic elements reshape historical reality into a narrative of fear, excess, and cultural opposition. Drawing on postcolonial theory, particularly Orientalism by Edward Said, as well as discourse analysis, the research demonstrates how Timur is represented not as a complex historical figure but as an embodiment of the “Eastern Other.” The article argues that myth functions as an ideological tool that reinforces binary oppositions between East and West, civilization and barbarism. Ultimately, the study reveals how literary myth-making contributes to enduring cultural stereotypes and influences the reception of historical figures within Western literary tradition
References
.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC), the author (s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution).
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. the right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. the right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale,
4. the right to self-archive the article.










