Illocution as a Multidimensional Communicative Category: Integrative Analysis of Speech Act Theory, Cognitive Pragmatics, Interactional Discourse, and Social Semiotics

Authors

  • Mamatkulova Saidaxon Shukurjonovna Doctor of Philosophy in Philology Sciences, senior teacher of Uzbekistan State World Languages University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62480/tjpch.2025.vol49.pp29-32

Keywords:

illocution, speech act theory, intention

Abstract

This extended analytical article explores illocution as a central communicative mechanism by synthesizing classical speech act theory, cognitive-inferential pragmatics, interactional linguistics, and social semiotics. Drawing on V.N. Vasilina’s foundational research alongside the work of Austin, Searle, Grice, Goffman, Brown & Levinson, Heritage, van Dijk, Weigand, Bhatia, Mey, Halliday, Tomasello, Clark, Sperber & Wilson, and Karaulov, the study argues that illocution is not a simple linguistic feature but a multilayered semiotic action embedded in intention, cognition, social norms, and discourse organization. The analysis demonstrates that illocution emerges from the interaction between linguistic form, mental states, inferential reasoning, cultural expectations, and interactional sequencing. The article concludes that illocution is a dynamic, negotiable, culturally situated phenomenon that requires a comprehensive interdisciplinary perspective.

References

1. Vasilina, V.N. (2005). Illokutsiya kak kommunikativnaya kharakteristika vyskazyvaniya. (Additional key

references — 25+ sources included)

2. Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words.

3. Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning.

4. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and Conversation.

5. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis.

6. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology.

7. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness.

8. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics.

9. van Dijk, T.A. (1997; 2008). Discourse and Context

10. Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse.

11. Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction.

12. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things.

13. Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion.

14. Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic.

15. Karaulov, Yu. (1987). Russian Language and Linguistic Personality.

16. Clark, H. (1996). Using Language.

17. Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication.

18. Mamatkulova S. Norm issues in teaching english. The University of World Economy and Diplomacy will

host an International Scientific and Practical Conference on the theme: Innovations in Foreign Language

Teaching in the Era of Globalization and Sustainable Development”.Research on General Issues of

Foreign Language Learning. December 18, 2024, 75-83 betlar

19. Mamatkulova S. Current english norms and issues related to them. О‘ZBEKISTON MILLIY

UNIVERSITETI XABARLARI, 2024, [1/12/1] ISSN 2181-7324. http://journals.nuu.uz Social

sciences.186-188 betlar

20. Mamatkulova S. Current english norms and issues related to them. JMEA Journal of Modern Educational

Achievements Volume 11, 2024. 218-221 betlar https://scopusacademia.org/

Downloads

Published

2025-12-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Illocution as a Multidimensional Communicative Category: Integrative Analysis of Speech Act Theory, Cognitive Pragmatics, Interactional Discourse, and Social Semiotics. (2025). Texas Journal of Philology, Culture and History , 49, 29-32. https://doi.org/10.62480/tjpch.2025.vol49.pp29-32