##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 60 Download : 36

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

In this article deals with the status of natural-scientific knowledge developed along with technical sciences in the non-classical landscape of the world, and at the same time the differences between them are revealed. Also, theories such as uniformism, transformism, Lamarckism, and catastrophism were analyzed as a unique status of natural-scientific knowledge. In addition, the impact of the natural-scientific knowledge formed in this period on the way of thinking of the people of the next period is revealed

Keywords

mechanical landscape uniformism transformism

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Pardayev Sultanmurad. (2023). The role of philosophical thinking in the development of natural-scientific knowledge in the 18th century. Texas Journal of Philology, Culture and History, 25, 48–51. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjpch/article/view/4882

References

  1. O‘sarov O‘.T. Tabiatshunoslik asoslari. – Toshkent: Mehnat, 2004. – B. 20.
  2. Shermuxamedova N.A. Ilmiy tadqiqot metodologiyasi. – Tошкент: Innovatsiyo-Ziyo, 2021. – B. 43.
  3. Шермухамедова Н.А. Синергетиканинг фалсафий масалалари. – Tошкент: Ношир, 2005. – Б.
  4. Тураев Б.О. Борлиқ (фалсафий таҳлил) // Имом Бухорий халқаро илмий-тадқиқот маркази. –
  5. Самарқанд-Тошкент: Munis design group, 2022. – Б.39.
  6. Тураев Б.О. Борлиқ (фалсафий таҳлил) // Имом Бухорий халқаро илмий-тадқиқот маркази. –
  7. Самарқанд-Тошкент: Munis design group, 2022. – Б. 39-40.
  8. Файзуллаев О. Фалсафа ва фанлар методологияси. – Тошкент: Фалсафа ва ҳуқуқ, 2006. – Б.