##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 56 Download : 58

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The article deals with questions about how the language forms of kinship terms changed from the point of view of national ethnogenesis, how the terms of kinship changed with the development of social and family relations, their phonetic, nominal and semantic similarity.

Keywords

kinship relations kinship terms terminology family relations names of peopl

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Saidova Mukhabbathon Shukrullayevna. (2023). Phonetic, nominal and semantic similarity of kinship terms. Texas Journal of Philology, Culture and History, 18, 81–84. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjpch/article/view/4016

References

  1. Arseniev V.R. On the linguistic and social dimensions of ethnocultural reality (in connection with the study of the Bambara system of kinship terms) // Kinship Algebra. St. Petersburg: MAE RAN, 1998. - Publication. 2. - S.7-32.
  2. Abduali B., Konuratbayeva Z. M., Abikenova G. T., Karipjanova G. T., Sagdieva R. K., Akseleu Seydimbek. (2008). Kazakh oral history: a study. Astana: Foliant, 728 p.
  3. .Arseniev V.R. On the linguistic and social dimensions of ethnocultural reality (in connection with the study of the Bambara system of kinship terms) // Kinship Algebra. St. Petersburg: MAE RAN, 1998. - Publication. 2. - S.7-32.
  4. Bliznyuk O. V. (2006) Comparative semantic analysis of kinship terms in different linguistic cultures: Dis Cand. Philol. Sciences: 10.02.20. Tver, 163 pages.
  5. Bikbulatov N.V. Anthroponyms and kinship terms // Onomastics along the Volga. Ulyanovsk: Institute of Linguistics of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1973. - Issue 3. - B.6-13.
  6. Butinov H. A. (1979). Kinship typology. Problems of typology in ethnography. M.: Science. - R. 66-Demyankov V. Z. (1994). Cognitive linguistics as a type of interpretation. Linguistic issues, N 4, p. 17-33.
  7. Dyrenkova N. P. On the theory and methodology of identical reconstruction of protosystems of kinship terms // Nast. ed.
  8. Nominkhanov Ts.-D. Kinship terms in the Turkic and Mongolian languages // Issues of the history and dialectology of the Kazakh language. Edition. 1. Alma-Ota, 1958
  9. Explanatory dictionary of the Kazakh language (2008). Sochiraziyat.so Nishishi.ad T. Zhanuzakov. Almaty: Dyke Press, 968 p. ISBN 9965-798-99-0
  10. Fattahova, R. F., Sagdieva, R. K., Aydarova, S. H., & Giniyatullina, L. M. (2016). About the origin, phonetic variants, semantic and stylistic features of the use of affixes in Turkic languages. Man in India, 96(10), 3529-3539.
  11. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECSE)
  12. DOI:10.9756/INTJECSE/V14I5.968 ISSN: 1308-5581 Vol 14, Issue 05 2022 Signs of the Consonant Positions in Turkic Languages
  13. (The Examples in Namangan Area Kipchak Dialects in the Republic of Uzbekistan)
  14. Darvishov. Ibrahim Urmanovich, Senior Teacher, (PhD) Namangan State University, Uzbekistan. E-mail: ibmofifar@bk.ru
  15. Saidova Mukhabatkhan Shukrullaevna, Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Namangan State University ORCID: 0000-0002-5391-2789 ibmofifar@bk.ruom
  16. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECSE)DOI:10.9756/INTJECSE/V14I5.969 ISSN: 1308-5581 Vol 14, Issue 05 2022 Phonetic Patterns Associated with Vowels in Namangan Dialects
  17. Saidova Mukhabbathan Shukrullaevna, Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Namangan State University, Uzbekistan. E-mail: sayova.muhabbatxon@yandex.ru, ORCID: 0000-0002-5391-2789 Nematova Yulduz Odilzhanovna, Doctor of Philology, Karshi State University, Karshi, Kashkadarya Region, Uzbekistan, St. Kochaboga. E-mail: nematovaulduz5@ gmail.com
  18. http://www.t-science.org/arxivDOI/2020/11-91/11-91-73.html
  19. http://t-science.org/arxivDOI/2021/06-98/06-98-46.html