##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

One hundred (100) patients were collected from different hospitals in Iraq, and a cross-sectional
study was designed using an electronic system) what is the name of the system) of samples that were
evaluated and approved by the competent committees in Iraq?
The population included in the study was residents of Baghdad, Muthanna, and Basrah Governorates who
voluntarily agreed to participate from 5 years to 45 years of age and indicated that those under 18 years of
age should obtain permission from their parents or legal guardians (expressing consent in an e-mail form
prior to arrival to the exploratory study).
The data collected by in this research, the questionnaire, which was designed based on a number of sections,
including the age of patients, in addition to the variables associated with smart phone devices and visual
symptoms to the eyes. Demographic data related to the patients were also analyzed by relying on the IBM
SOFT SPSS program.
The patients were classified into two groups (60 patients and 40 control). The period of time the patient
spent on the phone was 4.3±1.9 for the patient and 3.5±1.1 for the control
in this study, the assessment according to dry eye severity (for mild, 10 (16.6), control 26 (65)-Moderate
for patient 33 (55), control 8 (20)-Severe Irreversible damage to the ocular surface Plus for patient 17 (28.3),
control 6 (15) with p-value <0.05
Complications found in this study include Conjunctivitis, Keratitis, Corneal ulcer, Inability to wear contact
lenses, Damage to the surface of eyes, decreased quality of life, and Photophobia for 40 patients and 17
control.
Statistical analysis program was used to find out the type of statistical relationship emerging between the
time spent using smartphones and dry eyes, where person correlation was used at a statistical significance
level at p-value <0.001, while in this study, it was found that there is a direct relationship between the Time
spent to use a phone with dry eyes

Keywords

Eye, Schirmer, Blepharitis, Phone, Disease, Dry

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Dr. Hassan Muslem Abdulhussein, Dr. Khalid Ghaffar Kadhim, & Dr.Ali Tariq Hussein. (2023). Effects of overuse of phones and other smart devices on Blepharitis and dry eye. Texas Journal of Medical Science, 20, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.62480/tjms.2023.vol20.pp90-98

References

  1. Amano S, Inoue K. Estimation of the prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction in Japan. Cornea. 2017; 36:684–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asiedu K, Kyei S, Dzasimatu SK, Morny EK. Meibomian gland dysfunction in a youthful clinical sample in Ghana. Optom Vis Sci. 2018; 95:349–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rhee D, Pyfer M. Blepharitis/Meibomitis. In: Rhee D, Pyfer M, editors. The Wills Eye Manual: Office and Emergency Room Diagnosis and Treatment of Eye Disease. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999. pp. 141–2. [Google Scholar]
  4. A.Ao. Ophthalmology, Blepharitis Preferred Practice Pattern-Management. 2018. [Last accessed on 2019 Jun 26]. Available from: https://www.aaojournal.org/article/S0161-6420 (18)32645-9/pdf. [PubMed]
  5. Ng A, Evans K, North R, Purslow C. Eye cosmetic usage and associated ocular comfort. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012; 32:501–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goto T, Zheng X, Gibbon L, Ohashi Y. Cosmetic product migration onto the ocular surface: Exacerbation of migration after eye drop instillation. Cornea. 2010; 29:400–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ng A, Evans K, North RV, Purslow C. Migration of cosmetic products into the tear film. Eye Contact Lens. 2015; 41:304–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hunter M, Bhola R, Yappert MC, Borchman D, Gerlach D. Pilot study of the influence of eyeliner cosmetics on the molecular structure of human meibum. Ophthalmic Res. 2015; 53:131–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Platia EV, Michels RG, Green WR. Eye-cosmetic-induced conjunctiva pigmentation. Ann Ophthalmol. 1978; 10:501–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Donaldson DD. Mascara pigmentation of the conjunctiva. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969; 81:124–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sugar HS, Kobernick S. Subconjunctival pigmentation; associated with the use of eye cosmetics containing carbon-black. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966; 62:146–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Al-Ashban RM, Aslam M, Shah AH. Kohl (surma): A toxic traditional eye cosmetic study in Saudi Arabia. Public Health. 2004; 118:292–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hidayat AA, Weatherhead RG, Al-Rajhi A, Johnson FB. Conjunctival and lacrimal sac pigmentation by kohl (eyeliner) Br J Ophthalmol. 1997; 81:418. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ding J, Kam WR, Dieckow J, Sullivan DA. The influence of 13-cis retinoic acid on human meibomian gland epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54:4341–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ong BL, Larke JR. Meibomian gland dysfunction: Some clinical, biochemical and physical observations. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990; 10:144–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Larke JR. London: Butterworth; 1985. The Eye in Contact Lens Wear; pp. 5–6. 47. Henriquez AS, Korb DR. Meibomian glands and contact lens wear. Br J Ophthalmol 1981; 65:108-11. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xie WJ, Jiang LJ, Zhang X, Xu YS, Yao YF. Eyelid margin cleaning using Deep Cleaning Device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction-associated dry eye: A preliminary investigation. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2019; 20:679–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Perry HD, Serniuk RA. Conservative treatment of chalazia. Ophthalmology. 1980; 87:218–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Arr 2 M, Samudio M, Faridi N, Cibils D, Laspina F, Sanabria R, et al. Comparative study of the efficacy of different treatment options in patients with chronic blepharitis. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2015; 90:112–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Song P, Sun Z, Ren S, Yang K, Deng G, Zeng Q, et al. Preoperative management of MGD alleviates the aggravation of MGD and dry eye induced by cataract surgery: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019:2737968. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mylla Boso AL, Gasperi E, Fernandes L, Costa VP, Alves M. Impact of ocular surface disease treatment in patients with glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020; 14:103–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ng A, Evans K, North RV, Purslow C. Migration of cosmetic products into the tear film. Eye Contact Lens. 2015; 41:304–9.
  23. Hunter M, Bhola R, Yappert MC, Borchman D, Gerlach D. Pilot study of the influence of eyeliner cosmetics on the molecular structure of human meibum. Ophthalmic Res. 2015; 53:131–5.
  24. Platia EV, Michels RG, Green WR. Eye-cosmetic-induced Conjunctival pigmentation. Ann Ophthalmol. 1978; 10:501–4.
  25. Donaldson DD. Mascara pigmentation of the conjunctiva. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969; 81:124–5.
  26. Moon JH, Kim KW, Moon NJ. Smartphone use is a risk factor for paediatric dry eye disease according to region and age: a case-control study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16 (1):188 10.1186/s12886-016-0364-4 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar
  27. Kojima T, Ibrahim OMA, Wakamatsu T, et al. The impact of contact lens wear and visual display terminal work on the ocular surface and tear functions in office workers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152 (6):933–940.e2. 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.025 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee JB, Kim SH, Lee SC, Tsuyama A, Ogawa J, Matsumoto Y, et al. Blue light-induced oxidative stress in human corneal epithelial cells: protective effects of ethanol extracts of various medicinal plant mixtures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55 (7):4119–4127. 10.1167/iovs.13-13441 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee HS, Cui L, Li Y, Choi JS, Choi JH, Li Z, et al. Influence of light emitting diode-derived blue light overexposure on mouse ocular surface. PLoS One. 2016;11 (8): e0161041 10.1371/journal.pone.0161041 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar].