##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 21 Download : 23

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The article describes challenges encountered in the existing methodologies used to develop physical qualities in students. As physical education evolves, educators face various obstacles that hinder the effectiveness of traditional and modern approaches. The paper aims to identify these challenges, analyze their impact on student outcomes, and propose potential solutions to enhance the development of physical qualities in educational settings. Addressing the challenges in current physical education methodologies is essential for fostering the holistic development of students. The author states that by identifying and overcoming these obstacles, educators can create more effective and engaging programs that promote lifelong physical fitness and well-being.

Keywords

challenges technology methodology

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Niyazov Asqarbay Tolibaevich. (2024). Challenges Faced In The Current Methodologies Of Developing Physical Qualities In Students. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 33, 30–34. https://doi.org/10.62480/jpip.2024.vol33.pp30-34
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. M. (2017). Digital technologies and learning in
  2. physical education: Pedagogical cases. Routledge.
  3. Fairclough, S., & Stratton, G. (2005). Physical activity levels in middle and high school
  4. physical education: A review. Pediatric Exercise Science, 17(3), 217-236.
  5. Hardman, K., & Marshall, J. J. (2000). The state and status of physical education in schools
  6. in international context. European Physical Education Review, 6(3), 203-229.
  7. Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. Routledge
  8. Lamb, P., & Lane, K. (2013). Personalised learning and physical education. In J. Quay & A.
  9. Mooney (Eds.), Theory and Practice in Physical Education: Contemporary Issues (pp. 101-
  10. . Australian Council for Health, Physical Education and Recreation.
  11. Morgan, P. J., & Hansen, V. (2008). The relationship between PE teachers' and students'
  12. motivational climates: Perspectives on the role of teachers and their teaching. European
  13. Physical Education Review, 14(2), 197-218.
  14. Ntoumanis, N., Pensgaard, A. M., Martin, C., & Pipe, K. (2004). An ideographic analysis of
  15. amotivation in compulsory school physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise
  16. Psychology, 26(2), 197-214.
  17. Qi, J., & Ha, A. S. (2012). Inclusion in physical education: A review of literature. International
  18. Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 59(3), 257-281.
  19. Utebaev T., Sarsenbaeva Z. Sprachliche analyse von sprichworten. Berlin Studies
  20. Transnational Journal of Science and Humanities. Vol. 1 Issue 1.5 Pedagogical sciences.
  21. Islomovich I. T. et al. Perspectives of employing world experience in providing academic and
  22. financial independence to higher education //Horizon: Journal of Humanity and Artificial
  23. Intelligence. – 2023. – Т. 2. – С. 232-235.