##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 120 Download : 66

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

This article investigates how module-based education enhances philology students' monologue speech abilities at the B2 level. Breaking down the complicated skill of delivering monologue speech into smaller modules allows students to focus on specific components of language creation and delivery. The study looks at how this strategy improves students' pronunciation, fluency, vocabulary, and overall communication skills. The study aims to provide empirical evidence of the benefits of module-based education in improving students' monologue speech abilities by analyzing quantitative data.

Keywords

module-based learning English monologue speech B2 level

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Shamsiddinova Dilafruz Faxriddinovna. (2024). The Impact Of Module-Based Instruction On B2 Level Students’ Monologue Speech. Texas Journal of Philology, Culture and History, 37, 36–40. https://doi.org/10.62480/tjpch.2024.vol37.pp36-40

References

  1. Almazova, N., Sheredekina, O., Odinokaya, M., & Smolskaia, N. (2021). The Educational Technology
  2. of Monological Speaking Skills Formation of Future Lawyers. Education Sciences, 11(7), 330.
  3. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070330
  4. Brown, H.D. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, 2nd ed.; San
  5. Fransisco State University: San Fransisco, CA, USA, 2001.
  6. Dilafruz, S. (2024). INNOVATIVE TECH SOLUTIONS FOR MONOLOGUE SPEECH
  7. DEVELOPMENT OF B2 LEVEL ENGLISH LEARNERS. Hamkor konferensiyalar, 1(6), 179-182.
  8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14201293
  9. Dochy F, Open Univ. H, (2013). And O. Modularization and Student Learning in Modular Instruction
  10. in Relation with Prior Knowledge. [serial online]. January 1, 1989; Available from: ERIC, Ipswich,
  11. MA. Accessed May 14
  12. Doe, T. Oral Fluency Development Activities: A One-Semester Study of EFL Students; ProQuest
  13. Dissertations Publishing, Temple University: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2017; p. 276.
  14. Gahutu, J. (2010). Physiology Teaching and Learning Experience in a New Modular Curriculum at the
  15. National University of Rwanda. Advances In Physiology Education, 34(1), 11-14.
  16. Ibyatova, Lyaysan & Oparina, Ksenia & Rakova, Elena. (2018). Modular Approach To Teaching And
  17. Learning English Grammar In Technical Universities. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of
  18. the International Scientific Conference. 1. 139. 10.17770/sie2018vol1.3229
  19. Kakurina, O. A. (2012). O modul'noj tehnologii obuchenija inostrannym
  20. jazykam.http://pskgu.ru/projects/pgu/storage/wt/wt111/wt111_14.pdf.
  21. Karpovich, Irina & Sheredekina, Oksana & Krepkaia, Tatiana & Voronova, Larisa. (2021). The Use of
  22. Monologue Speaking Tasks to Improve First-Year Students’ English-Speaking Skills. Education
  23. Sciences. 11. 298. 10.3390/educsci11060298.
  24. Tseng, S., Su, J., Hwang, G., Hwang, G., Tsai, C., & Tsai, C. (2008). An Object-Oriented Course
  25. Framework for Developing Adaptive Learning Systems. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2),
  26. -191.
  27. Yotovska, Kamelia. (2013). MODULE-BASED APPROACH FOR DESIGN OF M-LEARNING
  28. COURSE. XI-th International Conference on Challenges in Higher Education and Research in the 21st
  29. Century. Sofia, Bulgaria. 43-46.