##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

This article tackled a rigorous review of plant anatomy and its history. The anatomy of the plant is significantly essential, and it is grown all over the world. However, most of it is produced in tropical and subtropical countries, and just a few of its species are grown in temperate zones. The anatomical studies are preliminary studies that come before the critical studies of these plants and fulfill the necessary learning for those studies. Although only a small number of plant taxa have really been explored physically up to this point, more species have likely been investigated chemically. This article provides a comprehensive look at the history of plant anatomy tools as well as anatomical investigations that have been conducted on plants

Keywords

Review Plant anatomy Biological

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Atheer Hashim Abdulmajeed, Hisham majeed shlash, & Ashwaq talib hameed. (2022). A Review of Plant Anatomy Tools and Their History. Texas Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 8, 138–147. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjabs/article/view/2409

References

  1. Albrechtová, J. (1994). Quantitative analysis of leaves of sun and shade ecotypes of Solanum dulcamara
  2. L. Acta Stereologica.
  3. Pang, Y., Li, L., & Bian, F. (2020). Photosynthetic and ultrastructural adaptability of Anemone shikokiana
  4. leaves to heterogeneous habitats. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 43(4), 979-988.
  5. Yu, L., Fujiwara, K., & Matsuda, R. (2022). Recent levels of daily photosynthetic photon flux density
  6. have a larger influence on the light acclimation responses of cucumber leaves than earlier. Horticulture,
  7. Environment, and Biotechnology, 63(1), 55-63.
  8. Baker, C. R., Stewart, J. J., Amstutz, C. L., Ching, L. G., Johnson, J. D., Niyogi, K. K., ... & Demmig‐
  9. Adams, B. (2022). Genotype‐dependent contribution of CBF transcription factors to long‐term acclimation
  10. to high light and cool temperature. Plant, Cell & Environment, 45(2), 392-411.
  11. Yu, L., Fujiwara, K., & Matsuda, R. (2021). Estimating Light Acclimation Parameters of Cucumber
  12. Leaves Using Time-Weighted Averages of Daily Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density. Frontiers in plant
  13. science, 12, 809046-809046.
  14. ALBRECHTOVA, J., & KUBlNOVA, L. U. C. I. E. (1991). Quantitative analysis of the structure of
  15. etiolated barley leaf using stereological methods. Journal of experimental botany, 42(10), 1311-1314.
  16. Hunt, L., Fuksa, M., Klem, K., Lhotáková, Z., Oravec, M., Urban, O., & Albrechtová, J. (2021). Barley
  17. Genotypes Vary in Stomatal Responsiveness to Light and CO2 Conditions. Plants, 10(11), 2533.
  18. Kubínová, Z. (2019). Study of quantitative parameters of Norway spruce needle structure under the effect
  19. of elevated CO₂ concentration and different irradiance.
  20. Böszörményi, A., Dobi, A., Skribanek, A., Pávai, M., & Solymosi, K. (2020). The effect of light on plastid
  21. differentiation, chlorophyll biosynthesis, and essential oil composition in rosemary (Rosmarinus
  22. officinalis) leaves and cotyledons. Frontiers in plant science, 11, 196.
  23. Sathasivam, M., Hosamani, R., & Swamy, B. K. (2021). Plant responses to real and simulated
  24. microgravity. Life Sciences in Space Research, 28, 74-86.
  25. Ali, A., & Arif, W. P. (2019). Developing of guidance for laboratory practice of islamic science-integrated
  26. plant anatomy-physiology. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(1), 70-82.
  27. Legland, D., Devaux, M. F., & Guillon, F. (2018). Quantitative imaging of plants: multi-scale data for
  28. better plant anatomy. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69(3), 343-347.
  29. Daniel, A. D. I., & Tawakaltu, I. N. (2019, October). Effects of Pseudocedrela kotschyi stem bark on blood
  30. chemistry and histology of some organs in rats. In Science Forum (Journal of Pure and Applied
  31. Sciences) (Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1-1). Faculty of Science, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University Bauchi.
  32. Pappas, M. L., Baptista, P., Broufas, G. D., Dalakouras, A., Djobbi, W., Flors, V., ... & Papadopoulou, K.
  33. (2020). Biological and molecular control tools in plant defense. In Plant defence: biological control (pp.
  34. -43). Springer, Cham.
  35. Poorter, H., Niinemets, Ü., Ntagkas, N., Siebenkäs, A., Mäenpää, M., Matsubara, S., & Pons, T. (2019).
  36. A meta‐analysis of plant responses to light intensity for 70 traits ranging from molecules to whole plant
  37. performance. New Phytologist, 223(3), 1073-1105.
  38. Doležal, J., Dvorský, M., Börner, A., Wild, J., & Schweingruber, F. H. (2018). Anatomy, age and ecology
  39. of high mountain plants in Ladakh, the Western Himalaya. Springer.
  40. Steven, B., Huntley, R. B., & Zeng, Q. (2018). The influence of flower anatomy and apple cultivar on the
  41. apple flower phytobiome. Phytobiomes, 2(3), 171-179.
  42. Song, Q., Jiang, P., Zheng, S., Kong, Y., Zhao, Y., & Shen, G. (2019). Dynamic Semi-Quantitative Risk
  43. Research in Chemical Plants. Processes, 7(11), 849.
  44. He, T., Marco, J., Soares, R., Yin, Y., & Wiedenhoeft, A. C. (2019). Machine learning models with
  45. quantitative wood anatomy data can discriminate between Swietenia macrophylla and Swietenia
  46. mahagoni. Forests, 11(1), 36.
  47. Xie, F., Shi, Z., Zhang, G., Zhang, C., Sun, X., Yan, Y., ... & Chen, Y. (2020). Quantitative leaf anatomy
  48. and photophysiology systems of C3 and C4 turfgrasses in response to shading. Scientia
  49. Horticulturae, 274, 109674.
  50. Chen, G., Weng, Q., Hay, G. J., & He, Y. (2018). Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA):
  51. Emerging trends and future opportunities. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 55(2), 159-182.