Indicators and effectiveness of sensory and motor blocking unilateral spinal anesthesia combined with unilateral epidural analgesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62480/tjms.2024.vol34.pp1-4Keywords:
Combined unilateral spinal, epidural anesthesia, epidural spaceAbstract
The relevance of this issue is due to the intensive development and introduction of the latest technologies in modern surgical interventions, including joint replacement, and a significant expansion of indications for surgical treatment. We have already pointed out that in the vast majority of patients of these operations, elderly and senile people with various comorbidities and, in some cases, severely disabled, burdened with severe pain for many months and years, which leads to whole complexes of somatic reactions. and deviations in the clinical status of patients. All this greatly complicates the choice of the method of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. After all, postoperative pain is the result of surgery, but its treatment is not just a humane requirement, but a key aspect of postoperative therapy. Endoprosthetics of the joints of the lower limb is also a very traumatic intervention and, in some cases, is accompanied by significant blood loss. In the postoperative period, venous thrombosis and PE are the most dangerous [152; pp.101-106, 151; pp. 1018-1025, 72; pp.455-461]. In connection with the above, anesthesia should correspond to the nature of this intervention: completely block nociceptive impulses, maximally reduce perioperative blood loss and the need for donor blood components, the likelihood of developing thrombotic complications in the postoperative period, and the severity of postoperative pain syndrome [18; pp.210-212]. All these requirements are met to the maximum extent by the methods of central segmental blockades [92; pp. 810-814, 188; pp.193-199].
References
Basques B.A., Toy S.O., Bohl D.D. et al. General Compared with Spinal Anesthesia for Total Hip
Arthroplasty S Bone Joint Surg. // Am 2015. – №97. – P.455-461.
Mauermann W.J., Shilling A.M., Zuo Z. A comparison of neuraxial block versus general anesthesia
for elective total hip replascement: a meta-analysis. // Anesth Analg. 2006 oct 103(4) 1018-25. Epub
Sep 27.
Maurer S.G., Cen A.L., Hibert R., Pereria G.S., Di Cesare P.E. Comparison of the results of using
spinal and general anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty. // I am J Ortop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007July;
(7): E101-6.
Pugely A.J., Martin C.T., Gao Y., Mendozza-Lattes S., Callaghan J.J. Differences in short-term
complications between spinal and general anesthesia for primary total knee arthroplasty. // J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 2013 feb 6:95(3):193-9.
Chakladar A.,White S.M. Cost estimates of spinal versus general anesthesia for fractured neck of
femur surgery. Anasthesia. – 2010. aug 65(8):810-4.
Загреков В.И. и др. Влияние метода обезболивания на кровопотерию при эндопротезировании
тазобедренного сустава. // Медицинский альманах. 2010. – №2 (11). – С.210-212.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC), the author (s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution).
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. the right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. the right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale,
4. the right to self-archive the article.