##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

In addition, the characteristics of lines in different soil-climatic zones are given in accordance to the magnitude of variability and homeostaticity of the studied traits. The data of two-factor analysis of variance on the relative share of genotypic, environmental, and variability caused by the interaction of growing conditions × genotype in the general phenotypic variation of the trait are presented. According to the results of two-factor analysis of variance of cotton lines, it was revealed that the point of cultivation was the main factor that influenced the variability of the studied traits, the contribution of which, depending on the agronomic valuable trait, was 36.5-99.4%.

Keywords

Uzbekistan cotton lines growing conditions.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Khudarganov Kamoladdin Omonboyevich. (2023). Variability of Agronomic Valuable Traits of Cotton Lines Depending on the Genotype and Vegetation Conditions in Different Ecological Zones. Texas Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 15, 1–5. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjabs/article/view/3661

References

  1. Arbuzova, V.S. Izmenchivost priznakov produktivnosti kolosa u gibridov F2, poluchennyh ot skrechivaniya sortov myagkoy pshenici Novosibirskaya 67, Saratovskaya 29, Puza-4 s mnogotsvetkovoy liniey Skle 123-09. / V.S. Arbuzova, T.T. Efremov, P. Martinek, E.V. CHumanova, O.B. Dobrovolskaya // Vavilovskiy jurnal genetiki i seleksii. - 2014- tom. 18. - № 4/1. - p.704-712.
  2. Goncharov P.L. Reaksiya sortov yarovoy myagkoy pshenici na usloviya vneshney sredy v stepnoy zone Zapadnoy Sibiri (Severnaya Kulunda) / P.L. Goncharov, S.V. Kurkova, G.M. Osipova // Dostijeniya nauki i texniki APK. -2013- № 1. -p. 5–7, 10.
  3. Dyakov A.B. Sravnitelnaya otsenka adaptivnosti gibrida podsolnechnika Triumf / A.B. Dyakov [i dr.] // Maslichnye kultury.- 2005.- V. 2. – p. 3-6.
  4. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta / Moscow: Kolos, 1979. 416 p.
  5. Dubinina O.A. Adaptive potensial sortov ozimoy tverdoy pshenicy / O.A. Dubinina, N.N. Vojjova // Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka.- 2016.- № 2 (51).- p.29-33
  6. Kilchevskiy A.V. Geneticheskie osnovы seleksii rasteniy / A.V. Kilchevskiy // Minsk.- Belorusskaya nauka.- 2008.- T. 1.- p. 6-49.
  7. Komarov N.M. Nekotorye aspekty problemy vzaimodeystviya «genotip-sreda»/ N.M. Komarov // Dostijeniya nauki i texniki APK. -2012.- № 7. -p. 39–41.
  8. Lelli YA. Seleksiya pshenicy. Teoriya i praktika./ Lelli YA.// M.- Kolos.- 1980.- 384 p.;
  9. Moskalenko V.M. Ekologicheskiy effekt v izmenchivosti i xaraktere nasledovaniya produktivnosti kolosa myagkoy yarovoy pshenicy / V.M. Moskalenko, R.A. Silke // Sibirskiy vestnik selskoxozyaystvennoy nauki. - 2007. - №7. - p.33-39.
  10. Sapega V.A. Otsenka vzaimodeystviya genotip–sreda i gomeostatichnost sortov yachmenya / V.A. Sapega, G.SH. Tursumbekova // Izvestiya TSXA.- 2013.- v. 6.- p.82-93.
  11. Usatov A. V. Analiz izmenchivosti xozyaystvenno sennyh priznakov u sortov i gibridov podsolnechnika na sortoispytatelnyh uchastkax rostovskoy oblasti / A. V. Usatov, A.A. Ustenko, S.N. Trexsvoyakov, YU. V. Denisenko //Nauchno-texnicheskiy byulleten Vserossiyskogo nauchno- issledovatelskogo instituta maslichnyh kultur.- 2011.- V. 1 (146-147).- p.23-29.
  12. Hangildin V.V. Parametry otsenki gomeostatichnosti sortov i seleksionnyh liniy v ispytaniyah kolosovyh kultur/ V.V. Xangildin // Nauch.-texn. byul. -VSGI. –Odessa.- 1986. -№ 2 (60)- p. 36–41
  13. Hangildin V.V. O prinsipax modelirovaniya sortov intensivnogo tipa. Genetika kolichestvennyh priznakov selskohozyaystvennyh rasteniy / V.V. Xangildin // M.- 1978.- p.111-116