##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 120 Download : 94

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

To date, a number of scientific research on toponymy has been carried out in the country. They to some extent express their views on the geographical terms, including the active participation in their formation, as well as on the differences in the toponymic indicators that are part of such terms. However, the issue of toponymic indicators in Karakalpak linguistics is poorly studied. This is because the lexical units included in this group are of great importance in the study of geographical terms. Their scientific research provides a wealth of information about the evolution of different affixes in the modern Karakalpak language and the stages of development, the old methods of word formation, phonetic phenomena that are characteristic of a particular region. However, research in this area is not enough. It has many unresolved issues. This emphasizes the relevance of the topic of this master's dissertation.

Keywords

Toponymic indicators geographical terms Turkic langue places

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Awezmuratova Nurjamal Dastenbaevna. (2021). Indicators Related to The Words of Turkish Languages. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 182–185. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/zjssh/article/view/114

References

  1. Ancient Turkic dictionary. L., Science, 1969, p.69.
  2. Sevortyan E.V. Etymological dictionary of Turkic languages. M., Science, 1974, p. 65
  3. Rakhmatullaev Sh. Etymological dictionary of the Uzbek language. Tashkent, University, 2000, p.247.
  4. Sattarov GF Oikonomic terms with the meaning of "city" and "village" in the history of the Tatar language and toponymy.// "Soviet Turkology", 1988, №1, page 52;
  5. Baskakov NA Geographical nomenclature in the toponymy of the Altai Mountains. .// Toponymy of the East. Research and materials. M., 1969, p.70.
  6. Koraev S. Toponymy. Tashkent, National Society of Philosophers of Uzbekistan, 2006, p. 207.
  7. Dusimov Z. Historical and linguistic analysis of the toponymy of Khorezm. Author's abstract of the doctoral dissertation. Tashkent, 1989, p.118.
  8. Berdimuratova, A. K., & Mukhammadiyarova, A. J. (2020). Philosophical and methodological aspects of the interaction of natural environment and man. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.12.03.235
  9. Pirnazarov, N. (2020). Philosophical analysis of the issue of spirituality. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5).
  10. Ulı, Pirnazarov Nurnazar Rahsid; ,INFLUENCE OF VIRTUAL REALITY ON THE SPIRITUALITY OF INFORMATION SOCIETY,Евразийский Союз Ученых,,2-2 (71),,2020,ООО «Евразийское Научное Содружество»
  11. Alimbetov Yu., Pirnazarov N; ,Culture: tradition and novation,East European Scientific Journal,54,2,38-41,2020,"Aleje Jerozolimskie 85/21, 02-001 Warszawa, Polska»"
  12. Pirnazarov, Nurnazar; ,Structural model of spirituality as a philosophical phenomenon,Адам ?лемі,88,2,10-17,2021,
  13. Pirnazarov Nurnazar Rashid uli. (2021). Spirituality of the Human Being as A Philosophical Problem. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/zjssh/article/view/
  14. Sultanov Atabek, & Pirnazarov Nurnazar. (2021). The Phenomenon of Mass Culture. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 49–52. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/zjssh/article/view/19
  15. Pirnazarov Nurnazar, & Sultanov Atabek. (2021). Mass culture: towards the essence of the concept. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 1(1), 40–43. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/37