##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 88 Download : 69

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The analysis of long-term efficiency of operative treatment of pelvic prolapse for 213 women in periods ranging from 12 through questionnaire PISQ-12 (Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire), recommended for use in clinical practice of the international urogynaecologic Association and adapted by the authors for work . Method of evaluating the effectiveness of surgical treatment of pelvic and prostate has been streamlined through the introduction of a system of qualitative analysis of the results of the study of sexual function. Found that operational treatments pelvic prolapse have a positive effect on sexual function of women. Significant differences of sexual function in remote postoperative period depending on the type of operational benefits.The best effect with regard to the favourable dynamics of sexual function is achieved after laparoscopic operative treatment of pelvic prolapse compared with vaginal hysterectomy

Keywords

pelvic prolapse surgery remote effectiveness sexual function

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nasimova Nigina Rustamovna, Jalalova Iroda Abduzhabborovna, & Shamsieva Malika Shuxratovna. (2023). Sexual Dysfunction in Women Suffering from Gynecological Diseases. Texas Journal of Medical Science, 17, 63–66. https://doi.org/10.62480/tjms.2023.vol17.pp63-66
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1278–83.
  2. Novi JM, Jeronis S, Morgan MA, Arya LA. Sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women without pelvic organ prolapse. J Urol. 2005;173(5):1669–72.
  3. Hoen LA, Utomo E, Steensma AB, Blok BFM, Korfage IJ. The pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12): validation of the Dutch version. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(9):1293–303.
  4. Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P, et al. A randomised controlled trial of abdominal vs. laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):377–84.
  5. Lane FE. Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1962;20:72–7. 6. Rosati M, Bramante S, Bracale U, Pignata G, Azioni G. Efficacy of
  6. laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse. JSLS. 2013;17:235–44.
  7. Sarlos D, Brandner S, Kots L, Gygax N, Schaer G. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:1415–22.
  8. Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC. Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:322–7.
  9. Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes. Urology. 2012;79(3):532–6.
  10. Gupta P, Payne J, KillingerKA, EhlertM, Bartley J,Gilleran J, et al. Analysis of changes in sexual function in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse repair with abdominal or vaginal approaches. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(12):1919–24.
  11. van Iersel JJ, de Witte CJ, Verheijen PM, Broeders IAMJ, Lenters E, Consten ECJ, et al. Robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy for multicompartment prolapse of the pelvic floor: a prospective cohort study evaluating functional and sexual outcome. Dis Colon
  12. Rectum. 2016;59(10):968–74.
  13. Swift S, Morris S, McKinnie V, Freeman R, Petri E, Scotti RJ, et al. Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17(6):615–20.
  14. Parekh M, Swift S, Lemos N, Iskander M, Freeman B, Arunkalaivanan AS, et al. Mulitcenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:645–50.
  15. Rogers RG, CoatesKW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the pelvic organ prolapse / urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J. 2003;14:164–8.
  16. Diez-Itza I, Aizpitarte I, Becerro A. Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal surgery: a review at 5 years after surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18(11):1317–24.
  17. Clifton MM, Pizarro-Berdichevsky J, Goldman HB. Robotic female pelvic floor reconstruction: a review. Urology. 2016;91:33–40.
  18. Handa VL, Zyczynski HM, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Janz NK, Richter HE, et al. Sexual function before and after sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:629.e1–6.
  19. Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1332–8.
  20. Lethaby A, Ayeleke RO, Roberts H. Local oestrogen for vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;8
  21. Gruenwald I, Mustafa S, Gartman I, Lowenstein L. Genital sensation in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:981–4.