##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 80 Download : 149

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

Following article deals with the term of pragmalinguistics and the methodology of its study. Pragmatics and its entry into linguistics as a separate branch of linguistics have been discussed in detail in the article. Communicative linguistics, the study of speech activity and actions as a language have been analyzed as well. The principles of differentiation between pragmalinguistics and hidden pragmatics have been revealed in the article. Examples of hidden pragmalinguistics are given in the doctor's speech. Actually, this direction is used together with direct speech-communication terms and explained with examples. Without them, it is difficult for pragmalinguistics to reveal its potential. The article highlights the fact that pragmalinguistics is directly studied as a quality of semiotics and introduced as a separate direction. It was mentioned in our study that speech etiquette is the main tool of pragmalinguistics. In the article, speech etiquette, speechcommunication, subject-addressee and pragmalinguistics were interpreted as the object of study of our direct research.

Keywords

pragmalinguistics linguistics theory of linguistics

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Yunusova Maftuna Shokirovna. (2023). Investigating of the doctor’s speech within the framework of pragmalinguistics. Texas Journal of Philology, Culture and History, 15, 26–30. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjpch/article/view/3423

References

  1. Арутюнова Н.Д. Истоки, проблемы и категории прагматики // – Москва, 1985. – C.5-30
  2. Александрова О.В. Единство прагматики и лингвопоэтики в изучении текста художественной литературы // – Калининград, 1996. – C. 3-7.
  3. Безменова И.А. Некоторые проблемы теории речевых актов // Отв. ред. В.И. Герасимов: – Москва, 1984. – С. 146-222.
  4. Грайс Г.П. Логика и речевое общение // Вып. 16: Лингвистическая прагматика, – Москва,– 1985. – С. 217- 237.
  5. Jürgen Habermas Public space and political public sphere – the biographical roots of two motifs in my thought. // – Habermas 2004. – C. 12-17.
  6. Егорова М.А. Контрастивно-прагматический анализ способов реализации просьбы (британская, американская, русская традиции): Дис. … канд. филол. наук // – Воронеж, 1995. – 181 с.
  7. Кузибоева, Г.С. Ruhiy holat fe’llarining pragmalingvistik tadqiqi // – Молодой ученый. – 2021. – № 46 (388). – С. 385-387.
  8. Маслова В.А. Когнитив тилшунослик. – Самарқанд, 2011. – Б. 8
  9. Макаров М.Л. Основы теории дискурса //– Москва: ИТДГК «Гнозис» 2003. – 280 с
  10. Остин Дж..Р. Слово как действие– Москва, – Вып.: Теория речевых актов. – 1986. С. 20-129.
  11. Поспелова А.Г. Косвенные высказывания //– Ленинград, 1988. – С. 141-153
  12. Safarov Sh. Pragmalingvistika. Monografiya. Toshkent nashriyoti,2008-yil,318- b.
  13. Susov I. P. Semiotika i lingvisticheskaya pragmatika // – Москва, 1990. B. 125-126
  14. Серкова Н.И. К истории понятия прагматика // Методы лингвистических исследований: Межвузовский сборник научных трудов. –Хабаровск, 2000.– C.4-12
  15. Серль Дж. Р. Классификация иллокутивных актов // – Москва., 1999. – Вып.2. – С.229-253