USE OF DIFFERENT HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY METHODS AND A GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF POST-OPERATIVE VALUES

Abstract

Hemorrhoids is one of the most common health problems faced by internists, as the definition and aetiology are
discussed, and hemorrhoids is often a difficult condition in our daily practice.
Goal
This research aims to use different methods of hemorrhoidectomy and general evaluation of postoperative values of
Iraqi patients.
Materials and method
In this study, 90 hemorrhoidal patients who agreed to participate in the study were recruited.
An observational, descriptive, and retrospective study was conducted on patients with hemorrhoids using data
collected from several different hospitals in Iraq from July 2021 to November 2021.
A questionnaire was designed by expert physicians for patients with hemorrhoids group from the Ministry of Public
Health, a database was created using Microsoft Access, statistical analysis was performed using IBM SOFT SPSS 22
for Windows, and the final document was prepared with Microsoft Office package.
Consequences
The result found in this study is 90 patients were collected and divided into two groups (open 40 and closed 50)
between the ages of 20 to 60 years.
In this study, the ASA score was relied upon for the purpose of measuring the type of process pattern. In addition,
it was relied on to classify the degrees of pain and complications that cause by Iraqi patients. Weak results were
found in the open group, more than 0 in the closed group, where a statistically significant relationship of 0.041 was
found.
Conclusion
We conclude from this study that closed-type operations are better than open-type in stopping bleeding and closing
the wound in the anus in the future of the patient.