A Study Of Female Social Status In In The Works “Jane Eyre” By Charlotte Bronte And “Anna Karenina” By Leo Tolstoy

Authors

  • Ergasheva Nilufar Bozor kizi Master’s student of the University of Economics and Pedagogy Karshi city, Republic of Uzbekistan

Keywords:

synonymy, lexical semantics, English vocabulary, stylistic variation

Abstract

This study investigates the portrayal of female social status in Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë and Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy. By analyzing the two central female characters, the paper highlights how literature reflects the societal norms and constraints placed on women in Victorian England and 19th-century Russia. The findings reveal a shared struggle for identity, independence, and societal acceptance, despite cultural differences. Through a comparative literary analysis, the study aims to understand how gender, class, and morality shape women's roles in these canonical novels.

References

Brontë, C. (1847). Jane Eyre. London: Smith, Elder & Co.

Danieva M.Dj. The multifaceted nature of language. International journal of advanced research in

education, technology and management. Vol..4, Issue 1 ISSN:2349- 0012. I.F. 8.1. 2025. -P. 167-176

Daniyeva M.Dj. Applied Linguistics. -Karshi: Tafakkur ziyosi, 2025. – 135 p.

Gilbert, S. M., & Gubar, S. (1979). The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the

Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale University Press.

Homans, M. (1987). Women Writers and Poetic Identity. Princeton University Press.

Knapp, L. (1971). Leo Tolstoy. Twayne Publishers.

Showalter, E. (1991). Sister's Choice: Tradition and Change in American Women's Writing. Oxford

University Press.

Tolstoy, L. (1877). Anna Karenina. Trans. Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. Penguin

Classics.

Woolf, V. (1929). A Room of One’s Own. Hogarth Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Study Of Female Social Status In In The Works “Jane Eyre” By Charlotte Bronte And “Anna Karenina” By Leo Tolstoy. (2025). Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 44, 4-6. https://zienjournals.com/index.php/zjssh/article/view/6158