##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 208 Download : 280

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The current research aims to identify the level of strategic behavior in the organization in question and its impact on organizational excellence. The organization in question was the University of Karbala, and the sample included senior leaders from department managers and above, with some (85) people. A strategy followed by the organization under study was based on the model (Miles and Snow, 1978) and its impact on achieving organizational excellence, and some statistical methods were relied on to process the data obtained from the questionnaire from the (spss) and (Amos.23) program, such as percentages and arithmetic mean The standard deviation, the coefficient of variation, the normal test, and the certainty factor, and to know the correlation between the two variables, the simple correlation coefficient (Pearson) was relied upon. As for the effect of the independent variable on the dependent, the simple regression coefficient was used. The surveyed organization suffers from a decrease in the number of young leaders occupying leadership positions and the existence of a complex hierarchical organizational structure that is reflected this is due to the slowness of the procedures they are taking. The current research recommended conducting training courses to qualify leaders in the university administration to be able to achieve administrative excellence, which is reflected in human, structural, and strategic excellence.

Keywords

Strategic Behavior Organizational Excellence

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Zainab Abu Ali Khalaf, & Suhair Adel Hamed. (2022). Strategic Behavior and Role in Organizational Excellence, Senior Leadership Sample Field Research at University of Karbala. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7, 28–40. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/zjssh/article/view/1227

References

  1. alaloul, w. s., liew, m. s., zawawi, n. a. w., mohammed, b. s., adamu, m., &musharat, m. a. (2020), structural equation modelling of construction project performance based on coordination factors. cogent engineering, 7(1), pp.1-25
  2. andrews, rhys; boyne, george a.; law, jennifer; walker, richard m(2009), strategy formulation, strategy con- tent and performance. public management review, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1-22.
  3. bakker, a. b. (2017), strategic and proactive a roaches to work engagement. organizational dynamics, 46, 67-75. doi:10.1016/j.organ.2017.04.002
  4. blackmore, k., & nesbitt, k. (2012), verifying the miles and snow strategy types in australian small- and medium-size enterprises. australian journal of management, 38(1), 171–190. doi:10.1177/0312896212444692
  5. cassol, a., cintra, r. f., ribeiro, i., oliveira, a., & lorandi, b. (2019), measurement of the strategic behavior of micro and small-sized enterprises: an analysis su orted by the miles and snow typology (1978). revista adm. made, 23(1), 105-125.
  6. daradkah, amjad (2017) ,administrative empowerment and its relationship to organizational excellence with academic leaders at taif university from the faculty members perspective," an-najah university journal for research - b (humanities): vol. 31: iss. 8 , article 1. available at: https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/anujr_b/vol31/iss8/1
  7. dill, w. r(1958), environment as an influence on managerial autonomy ,administrative science quarterly v. 2(4), p. 409-443
  8. duncan, r. b. (1972) characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environment album certainty. administrative science quarterly, v. 17, p. 313-327.
  9. emery, f.; trist, e. l(1965). the causal texture of organizational environments. human relations. v. 18, p. 21-32.
  10. ershadi, m.j. and eskandari dehdazzi, r (2019), "investigating the role of strategic thinking in establishing organizational excellence model: a moderating role of organizational forgetting", the tqm journal, vol. 31 no. 4, . 620-640. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-05-2018-0062
  11. ghali, b. a. a., habeeb, l. m., & hamzah, k. d. (2018), self-management and its relation to organizational excellence. international journal of engineering and technology (uae), 7(4), 47-50
  12. gravley-stack, k. e. (2014), achieving inclusive excellence: the role of change agents and institutional artifacts in diversifying institutions (doctoral dissertation, north dakota state university).
  13. gupta, badrilal(2021), organizational structure for excellence, business manager vo. 11 no. 11 , pp20091-20093
  14. hambrick, d. c. (1983),some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of miles and snow's strategic types. academy of management journal, 26(1), 5–26. doi:10.5465/256132
  15. hannan, m.; freeman, j (1977), the population ecology of organizations. american journal of sociology, v. 82, n. 5, p. 929-964
  16. harrington, h. (2007). the five pillars of organizational excellence. in ieee engineering management review (vol. 34, issue 4, . 73–73). https://doi.org/10.1109/emr.2006.261408
  17. ingram,t.,kraśnicka,t.,wronka-pośpiech,m.,głód,g. & głód,w.(2016) .relationships between miles and snow strategic types and organizational performance in polish production companies. central european management journal,24(1) 17-45. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.162
  18. karim, s.m., sadq, z.m. and al-ahmedi, m.w. (2016). equity capital sovereignty and country's economical change. international journal of research in social sciences and humanities. 6(2): 1-9
  19. katz, d.; kahn, r. l. (1987),social psychology of organizations, 3. ed. são paulo: atlas.
  20. khalaf, wasan fadel., ajaj, muhammad naim., khalaf, karrar razzaq (2021), the impact of organizational excellence on creativity-oriented sustainability practices, journal of educational research and petroleum studies, no. 30, pages (80-99).
  21. kosslyn, s. m., & rosenberg, r. s. (2001),psychology: the brain, the person, the world. boston: allyn & bacon
  22. nami, y., & koizumi, r. (2013). structural equation modeling in educational research. in application of structural equation modeling in educational research and practice sensepublishers, rotterdam (pp. 23-51). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=structural+equation+modeling+in+educational+research:+a+primer&hl=ar&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
  23. rocha, da a. c., ceretta, g. f., & battisti, c. (2016). análise do comportamento estratégico das empresas localizadas no município de vitorino–pr. revista gesto, 4(2), 13-27.
  24. rossetto , carlos ricardo (2000), o comportamento estratégico segundo a teoria de miles e snow: um estudo multicaso em três empresas familiares na indústria da construção civesil://proce. /biblioteca/enegep2000_e0063.pdf
  25. sadq, z. m. (2020). the role of strategic alignment of business strategies according to the (miles & snow) model on strategic success. qalaai zanist scientific journal, 5(4), 677-706.
  26. soares, m. l., de paula teixeira, o. r., & pelissari, a. s. (2011). organizational behavior-an a lication of the typology of miles and snow in the hospitality industry from florianopolis-sc. revista de administração da ufsm, 4(2), 251-267.
  27. sollosy, marc., rebecca m. guidice, k. praveen parboteeah, (2019) “miles and snow's strategic typology redux through the lens of ambidexterity”, international journal of organizational analysis, https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa- 05-2018-1433
  28. tanner, s. (2005), an investigation into how business excellence can contribute to sustained organizational performance in both private and public sector organizations (doctoral dissertation, university of reading).
  29. walker, r. m. (2013). strategic management and performance in public organizations: findings from the miles and snow framework. public administration review, 73(5), 675–685. doi:10.1111/puar.12073
  30. wronka-pospiech, m., & fraczkiewicz-wronka, a. (2016). strategic orientation and organisational culture in polish public organisations: insights from the miles and snow typology. management, 20(1), 126.‏