##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 84 Download : 46

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

Pragmatics and sociolinguistics view the speech acts as the smallest unit of analysis in any speech event. The latter is defined as a “socially accepted” and “patterned sequence” in which the participants of specific speech community are involved. speech community is used to a group of participants who intuitively know how to behave in a speech event. Examples of the speech events are conversations, jokes, sermons, interview, prayers or political speeches (penalosa,198:71)

Keywords

Pragmatics Conversation Sociolinguistics Speech Community

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ilham Ahmed Abdulabbas. (2023). A Pragmatic Phenomenon of Conversation. Texas Journal of Philology, Culture and History, 21, 12–16. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjpch/article/view/4327

References

  1. Abdulla, H. I. (1989) “A Pragmatic Analysis of Two Excerpts from Robert Bolt's A man for All Seasons.” Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Lancaster University .
  2. Atkkinson, M. and Drew, (1979) Order in Court, Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.
  3. Blimes, J. (1986) Discourse and Behaviour, New York: Plenum.
  4. Clark, E. V. and Clark, H.H. (1977) Psychology and Language, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  5. Clark, E. V. and Clark, H.H. (1977) Psychology and Language, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  6. Coulthard M. (1985) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis, London: Longman Group Ltd.
  7. Drew, P. (1994) “ Conversation Analysis.” In Bolinger, D. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Oxford: Pergamon Press, Pp. 749- 753.
  8. Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Mey, J. (1993) Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
  10. Moeschler, J. ( 1986) “ Answers to Questions and Answers. “ In Journal of Pragmatics, No. 10, PP. 227- 253.
  11. Neville, A. “ The Role of Unestablished Referent in the Conversations of Young Communicatively Impaired Children” ( URL: http://nw al bion/ .4- net/ neville. html) Retrieved June 14, 2002.
  12. Sacks, H., Schegloff, F. and Jefferson, G. (1974) “ A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn- taking in Conversation.” In Schenkein, J. (ed.), Studies in the Organization Interaction, New York: Academic Press, Inc., PP. 7-55.
  13. Searle , J. and Vanderveken, (1985) Foundations of Illocutionary Logic, Cambridge University Press.
  14. Traugott, T.C. and Pratt, M.L.(1980) Linguistics for Students of Literature, New York: Harcourt Brace JovanOvich Inc.
  15. Trudgill, P. (1992) Introducing Language and Society, London: Penguin.
  16. Van Dijk, T. A. (1975) Pragmaticscof Language and Literature., Amsterdam:,North Holand Publishing Company.
  17. Verschueren, J. (1998) Understanding Pragmatics London: Edward Arnold.
  18. Winogard, T. (1987) “ A Language Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work.” In Human - Computer Interaction, Vol.3, No. 1, PP.1-30.
  19. Yule , G. (1997) Pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  20. Yule , G. (1999) The Study of Language , Cambridge: Cambridge University press.