##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 164 Download : 64

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

Clinical syndrome is caused by various causes, mainly the muscles of the brigades or the pain of the lower limbs, with or without lower back pain. This study aimed to find out and evaluate Preoperative Predictive Factors for The Results of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients from Mosul teaching hospital and Tikrit teaching hospital for the period January 2017 to December 2020 who underwent lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolysthesis. In this study, 100 patients were collected, with ages ranging from 40 years to 800 years, and the patients were distributed according to gender (46 males and 54 women). This study included 100 patients of them, 56 were female (56 %) while the other 44 were male (44%). The body mass index was calculated for all patients and was less than 25 in 20 patients, between 25-30 in 40 patients, and more than 35 in the other 44 patients. The other comorbidities observed were diabetes mellitus in 35 patients, ischemic heart disease in 20 patients, Hypertension in 40 patients and, depression in 40 patients, Smoking observed on eight patients. Lumbar level involvement was L4-L5 in 38 patients, 18 patients in L3-L4, L4-L5, 17 patients in L4-L5, L5- S1 ,12 patients was in L3-L4,L4-L5,L5-S1, 6 patients in L5-S1 ,3 patients in L2-L3 , 4 patients in L2- L3,L3-L4,L4-L5,L5-S1 the study concluded that smoking, cancer or neurological complications, and longer duration of lower extremity pain were all negatively associated with patient satisfaction and good outcome; While the ability to walk better before surgery was positively related to satisfaction at the 6-month follow-up

Keywords

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Dr. Zaid Azem Alshammaa, Dr. Mohammed Zuhair Shakir, & Dr. Yasir Adil Taha Taqa. (2022). Preoperative Predicting Factors for The Results of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery. Texas Journal of Medical Science, 15, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.62480/tjms.2022.vol15.pp103-111
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, et al. Associations between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis and clinical symptoms in the general population: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21:783–788. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Otani K, Kikuchi S, Yabuki S, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis has a negative impact on quality of life compared with other comorbidities: an epidemiological cross-sectional study of 1862 community-dwelling individuals. ScientificWorldJournal 2013; 2013:590652. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, et al. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 2010; 303:1259–1265. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Comer CM, Redmond AC, Bird HA, et al. Assessment and management of neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a UK primary care musculoskeletal service: a survey of current practice among physiotherapists. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009; 10:121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Binder DK, Schmidt MH, Weinstein PR. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Semin Neurol 2002; 22:157–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M, et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:794–810. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tosteson AN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after two years. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149:845–853. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fritsch CG, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, et al. The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur Spine J 2017; 26:324–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hebert JJ, Abraham E, Wedderkopp N, et al. Patients are undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis experience unique courses of pain and disability: a group-based trajectory analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0224200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ammendolia C, Schneider M, Williams K, et al. The physical and psychological impact of neurogenic claudication: the patients’ perspectives. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2017; 61:18–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheak-Zamora NC, Wyrwich KW, McBride TD. Reliability and validity of the SF-12v2 in the medical expenditure panel survey. Qual Life Res 2009; 18:727–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayes CJ, Bhandari NR, Kathe N, et al. Reliability and validity of the medical outcomes study Short Form-12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) in adults with non-cancer pain. Healthcare (Basel) 2017; 5:22.
  14. Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 1941; 2:281–4.
  15. Dalton JE, Kurz A, Turan A, et al. Development and validation of a risk quantification index for 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in noncardiac surgical patients. Anesthesiology 2011; 114:1336–44.
  16. Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ. American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status score may be used as a comorbidity index in hip fracture surgery. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25:134–7.
  17. Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, et al. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord 2009; 114:163–73.
  18. Purvis TE, Neuman BJ, Riley LH, et al. Comparison of PROMIS Anxiety and Depression, PHQ-8, and GAD-7 to screen for anxiety and depression among patients presenting for spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2019;1–8.
  19. Babington JR, Edwards A, Wright AK, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures: utility for predicting spinal surgery in an integrated spine practice. PM R 2018; 10:724–9.
  20. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16:606–13.
  21. Enke O, New HA, New CH, et al. Anticonvulsants in the treatment of low back pain and lumbar radicular pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2018;190: E786–93.
  22. Markman JD, Frazer ME, Rast SA, et al. Double-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial of pregabalin for neurogenic claudication. Neurology 2015; 84:265–72.
  23. Hebert JJ, Fritz JM, Koppenhaver SL, et al. Predictors of clinical outcome following lumbar disc surgery: the value of historical, physical examination, and muscle function variables. Eur Spine J 2016; 25:310–7.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.