##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 14 Download : 24

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

This study employes the time-series data analysis in terms of examining the impact of agriculture productivity on economic growth in case of Brazil throughout the period of 1973 and 2022. The outcomes of previous studies have been vary based on their empirical and theoretical approaches. The ARDL cointegration model is employed so as to interpret both short and long run relationships of independent variables with dependent variable. The outcome of this study suggested that, agriculture productivity is proposed to have negative impact on economic growth of concerned country in both short and long run relations. In addition to this, as a controlling variable some other variables are involved such as Inflation, gross capital formation, labor force and trade openness, the impact factor of those variables are also provided in the further paragraphs deeply. According to this, gross capital formation and labor force have presented positive integration while other variables showed the negative influence on economic growth during the provided time period in case of Brazil

Keywords

Brazil Agriculture productivity Economic growth

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Otabaev Yodgorbek Marim o’g’li. (2024). The impact of Agriculture productivity on economic growth in Brazil. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 37, 20–31. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjm/article/view/5621

References

  1. Ahmad, K., Chaudhary, M.A., and Ilyas, M. (2008). Trends in Total Factor Productivity in Pakistan
  2. Agriculture Sector. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 48 (2): 117-132.2. Awan, A.G. (2014) “The Enigma of US Productivity Slowdown: A theoretical Analysis” Journal of
  3. Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(3): 116-126.
  4. Awan, A.G. (2012) “Shifting Global Economic Paradigm” Asian Business Review; 4(3): 35-40.
  5. Awan, A.G., Nasir Nadeem and & Beenish Rashid (2015). “Factor Affecting Women Labour Supply
  6. in Agriculture Sector: A case study of District Rajanpur, Pakistan.
  7. Awan, A.G. & Vashma Anum (2014) “Impact of Infrastructure Development on Economic Growth”,
  8. Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability; 2(5): 1-15.
  9. Awan, A.G. (2014) “Changing World Economic Scenario: Advanced Versus Aging Economies” LAP
  10. Publishing Academy, Germany.
  11. Awan, A.G. (2015) “Comparative Analysis of Literature on Economic Growth in the perspective of
  12. advanced and emerging economies” Science International, 27(3): 2579-2587.
  13. Awan, A.G., Nasir Nadeem, and Abu Bakar Nawaz. (2015) “Analysis of the Profitability of BT Cotton
  14. Growers in District Multan-Pakistan” Journal of Resources Development and Management; 5(1): 1-7.
  15. Awan and Bilal Ahmad Sheikh (2015) “The Enigma of Education and Wealth on Poverty Alleviation:
  16. A Case study of District Rahimyar Khan (An unpublished Thesis), Institute of Southern Punjab,
  17. Multan. Pakistan.
  18. Hariyani, I. (2010). Restrukturisasi Penghapusan Kredit Macet (Restructuring in Writing off Bad
  19. Loans). Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia.
  20. Hasan, Z. (2008). Credit Creation and Control: An Unresolved Issue In Islamic Banking. MPRA paper
  21. no.8130.
  22. Herijanto, H. (2017). Moralitas Bank (Bank Morality). Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti.
  23. Huda, N., & Nasution, M. E. (2014) Current Issue Lembaga Keuangan Syariah (Current Issues in
  24. Islamic Financial Institutions). Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
  25. Ibrahim, A., & Rahmati, A. (2017). Analisis Solutif Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah di Bank
  26. Syariah: Kajian pada Produk Murabahah di Bank Muamalat Indonesia Banda Aceh (Solutive Analysis
  27. of Problem-Solving Financing in Sharia Banks: A Study on Murabaha Products at Bank Muamalat
  28. Indonesia Banda Aceh). Iqtishadia, 10(1), 71-96
  29. Indroes, F. (2008). Manajemen Risiko Perbankan (Banking Risk Management). Jakarta: PT Raja
  30. Grafindo Persada.
  31. Jassud, N., & Kang, K. (2015). Strategy For Developing a Market for Non-Performing Loans in Italy.
  32. IMF Working Paper, WP/15/24/2015.
  33. Jayant, A., Paul, V., & Kumar, U. (2015). Application of Analytic Network Process (ANP) in Business
  34. Environment: A Comprehensive Literature Review. IJRMET, 5(1), 29-37.
  35. Kasmir. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Perbankan (The Basic of Banking). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  36. Kettle, B, (2011). Introduction Sharia Banking and Finance. United Kingdom: Design and Patents Act.
  37. Khan, M., & Bhatti, M. (2008). Development in Sharia Banking the case of Pakistan. New York:
  38. Palgrave Macmillan.
  39. Khaskhelly, A. Z. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Performance of Sharia Vis a Vis Conventional
  40. Banking of Pakistan during Global Financial Crisis 2007-2010. Romanian Statistical Review
  41. Supplement, 63(3), 29-42.
  42. Koju, L., Koju, R., & Wang, S. (2018). Does Banking Management Affect Credit Risk? Evidence from
  43. the Indian Banking System. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(67), 1-11.
  44. Korankye, A. A. (2014). Causes and Control of Loan Default/Delinquency in Microfinance Institutions
  45. in Ghana. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(12), 36-45.
  46. Kwambi, K. D., & Wandera, M. (2013). Effects Of Credit Information Sharing on Nonperforming
  47. Loans: The Case of Kenya Commercial Bank Kenya. European Scientific Journal, 9(13), 168-193.