##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

This article examines interactive methods of motivation in elementary mathematics classes, highlighting strategies that enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. Traditional teaching approaches often lead to disengagement, whereas interactive techniques such as game-based learning, collaborative group work, and the use of manipulatives have been shown to foster a more dynamic and student-centered learning environment. Drawing on recent studies and educational research, the article emphasizes the role of these methods in satisfying students' intrinsic motivation needs and improving academic performance. By integrating interactive tools into their lesson plans, educators can create an engaging atmosphere that not only makes mathematics enjoyable but also cultivates essential problemsolving skills.

Keywords

educational games math bingo natural phenomena

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Dilnoza Khabibullo kizi Akhmedova. (2024). Interactive Methods Of Motivation In Elementary Mathematics Classes. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 37, 4–8. https://doi.org/10.62480/tjms.2024.vol37.5597.pp4-8

References

  1. Dilnoza, A. (2023). DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENTS'COGNITIVE ACTIVITY THROUGH
  2. INTERACTIVE ENCOURAGEMENT (In the Case of Primary Classes). Open Access
  3. Repository, 9(4), 17-22.
  4. Axmedova, D. (2024). O‘QUVCHILARNI INTERFAOL USULDA RAG‘BATLANTIRISHNING
  5. “4K” TAMOYILIGA TA’SIRI. Universal xalqaro ilmiy jurnal, 1(4), 476-478.
  6. Ахмедова, Д. (2023). O‘quvchilarni interfaol usulda rag‘batlantirish orqali tarbiyalash va intellektini
  7. rivojlantirishning pedagogik imkoniyatlari (boshlang‘ich sinflar misolida). Общество и
  8. инновации, 4(9/S), 121-127.
  9. John A. Van de Walle, Karen S. Karp, Jennifer M. Bay-Williams “Elementary and Middle School
  10. Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally”, Pearson Education 2019 y., 576 p.
  11. Page Keeley “Mathematics Formative Assessment: 75 Practical Strategies for Linking Assessment,
  12. Instruction, and Learning”, Corwin Press-2020y., 256 p.
  13. Alfred S. Posamentier, Stephen Krulik, “Engaging Students in Math Problem Solving”, Routledge
  14. y – 208 p7. Clark-Wilson, A., & Hoyles, C. (2023). Technology-enhanced learning in mathematics: Fostering
  15. engagement and motivation in elementary classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 26(2), 14-
  16. Drews, D., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2022). The impact of interactive mathematics tools on
  17. student motivation in elementary education: A review of digital learning platforms. International
  18. Journal of Educational Research, 114, 102034.
  19. García, J., & Sánchez, M. T. (2023). Game-based learning and motivation in elementary mathematics:
  20. A meta-analysis of digital games as interactive tools. Computers & Education, 195, 104691.
  21. Howard, J., & Jones, E. (2022). Collaborative learning in elementary mathematics: How peer
  22. interaction and group work boost motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,
  23. (4), 802-820.
  24. Kim, H., & Lee, S. (2024). Exploring inquiry-based learning in elementary mathematics: An
  25. interactive approach to fostering problem-solving and critical thinking skills. Teaching and Teacher
  26. Education, 123, 103975.
  27. López, A., & García, E. (2023). Interactive whiteboards in math education: Enhancing student
  28. participation and motivation in elementary classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology Research
  29. and Development, 71(3), 189-207.
  30. Moreno, M., & Valencia, T. (2022). Interactive manipulatives in elementary math: How tangible tools
  31. enhance student motivation and understanding. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(1), 25-
  32. Núñez, F., & Pérez, C. (2023). Project-based learning in elementary mathematics: A motivational
  33. approach through real-world applications. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 21-34.