##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 16 Download : 18

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

In world linguistics, particularly in Uzbek linguistics, the study of nonverbal means of speech communication (various states in the voice, gestures, facial expressions, and body movements) has been carried out in different aspects of the language. Modern life realities show that communication in all societies of the current world is characterized by extreme freedom, unpredictability, and distance from language rules. The role of nonverbal tools has increased more than ever, taking on a significant pragmatic load. Notably, nonverbal tools in virtual communication remain unnoticed by researchers. This article provides a brief overview of virtual communication and its study's degree and significance. Nonverbal forms of communication are also extensively analyzed. Additionally, linguistic and non-linguistic relations, their interaction, and contradictions, as well as the possibility of creating a certain image, are discussed. The characteristics of nonverbal means in the communication process are also highlighted. Furthermore, it addresses the communication and interaction process in Uzbeks and the forms of communication used historically.

Keywords

paralinguistics virtual communication nonverbal means

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nizomova Zarifa Kamoliddin qizi. (2024). The National-Cultural Features of Nonverbal Means. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 35, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.62480/tjms.2024.vol35.5479.pp1-5

References

  1. Aripova, A. Linguistic and Stylistic Means of Oratory Speech: Candidate of Philological Sciences
  2. Dissertation. – Tashkent, 2002. – 186 pages.
  3. Akbarova, Z. Forms of Address in the Uzbek Language and Their Linguistic Study: Candidate of
  4. Philological Sciences Dissertation. – Tashkent, 2007. – 135 pages.
  5. Kolshansky, G.V. Paralinguistics. – Moscow: Nauka, 1974.
  6. 4.Saidkhonov, M. Communication and Gestures. – Tashkent: Fan, 2008. – 83 pages.
  7. Iskandarova, Sh. Forms of Communication in Uzbek Speech Habits: Candidate of Philological
  8. Sciences Dissertation. – Samarkand, 1993. – 140 pages.
  9. Muminov, S. Social and Linguistic Characteristics of Uzbek Communication Behavior: Doctor of
  10. Philological Sciences Dissertation. – Tashkent, 2000. – 236 pages.
  11. Gorelov, I.N. Non-verbal Components of Communication. – Moscow: Knizhny Dom "LIBROKOM",
  12. – 112 pages.
  13. Kreidlin, G.E. Non-verbal Semiotics: Body Language and Natural Language. – Moscow: Novoe
  14. Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2002. – 592 pages.
  15. Kreidlin, G.E. Men and Women in Non-verbal Communication. – Moscow: Languages of Slavic
  16. Cultures, 2005. – 224 pages.
  17. See: Nurmonov, A. Expression with Paralinguistic Means in Incorning // Uzbek Language and
  18. Literature, 1979. – No. 1.;
  19. Nurmonov, A. Paralinguistic Means of the Uzbek Language. – Andijan, 1980. – 24 pages.
  20. Saidkhonov, M. Non-verbal Means and Their Expression in Uzbek: Candidate of Philological Sciences
  21. Dissertation. – Tashkent, 1993.
  22. Nurmonov, A., Saidkhonov, M. Paralinguistic Means of Expression of Affirmation and Negation //
  23. Soviet Turkology. 1986, No. 5. – pp. 61 – 69.;
  24. Saidkhonov, M. Semantics of Gesture Verbs // Uzbek Language and Literature. 1998, No. 1. – pp. 38
  25. – 41.
  26. http://www.meteor-city.top/neverbalnie-sredstva-internet.