##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 53 Download : 136

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The article deals with the concept of a political institution in its historical origin and development. A political institution is a kind of composite value in the state, forming its main authorities. In the historical context, most political scientists and sociologists have not directly singled out a political institution as something separate from the state. Only by the beginning of the 20th century did a clearer definition of a political institution appear and develop. And already modern researchers are considering a political institution, which is a set of political and economic organizations, of which not all are state-owned. The author argues that the development of political institutions within the state affects the strengthening of the system of "checks and balances", which makes the functioning of the state more successful. In addition, the author believes that the concept of a political institution is becoming "blurred" in modern research circles and requires a larger study to determine the essence of a political institution.

Keywords

state democracy political institution neo-institutionalism

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rasulov Sardor Makhmudjonovich. (2022). Political Institution As A Scientific Concept, In The Context Of The Historical Substantiation Of The Concept In The Theory Of Political Science. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 9, 169–172. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjm/article/view/2029

References

  1. Abramov A. V. Political institution and political institutionalization: definition of concepts // Power. 2010. No. 5. -FROM. 53-55.
  2. Andryushina E. Corporations as political subjects: state and global levels // Power. 2007. No. 8. -FROM. 12-15.
  3. Bogdanova N. A. To the question of the role of stratagems in Chinese diplomacy // Vestnik RUDN University. Series: International relations. 2015. No. 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-roli-stratagem-v-diplomatii-kitaya (Date of access: 04/27/2022).
  4. Gadzhiev Kh. A. Political institutions: institutional and neo-institutional approach // Power. 2015. No. 7. -FROM. 134-140.
  5. Sovereign / Niccolo Machiavelli; comp., foreword, comment. E. Vashkevich, trans. with it. G. Muravyova. - Moscow: AST Publishing House, 2021. - 256 p. — (Popular Philosophy).
  6. Huseynov A. A. MORAL AND POLITICS: LESSONS OF ARISTOTLE // Bulletin of Applied Ethics. 2004. No. 24. -FROM. 97-31.
  7. History and theory of political institutions in definitions, logic diagrams and tables: teaching aid / G.Ya. Kozlov; Ryaz. state un-t im. S.A. Yesenin. - Ryazan, 2006. - 96 p.
  8. Menshikov V.V. M. Weber on power // South Russian Journal of Social Sciences. 2012. No. 1.- S. 41-48.
  9. Polishchuk I. A. The party as a socio-political institution // Bulletin of the National University "Law Academy of Ukraine named after Yaroslav the Wise". Series: Philosophy, philosophy of law, political science, sociology. 2019. No. 4 (43). -FROM. 101-117.
  10. Rybakov A. V., Studnikov P. E. The category “Political institution” in modern political science // Topical issues of social sciences: sociology, political science, philosophy, history. 2015. No. 2 (43). -FROM. 18-27.
  11. Gilad Sh. "institution". Encyclopedia Britannica, 28 Dec. 2015. URL: https://www.britannica.com/topic/institution. (date of access: 30.04.2022)
  12. Hysing, E., Olsson, J. New Political Institutionalism. In: Green Inside Activism for Sustainable Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. (2018). URL: https://doi-org.proxylibrary.hse.ru/10.1007/978-3-319-56723-5_2 (date of access: 04/29/2022)
  13. Musso P. Technicity and the Power of Institution. Law Critique 33, 2022.–P.131–139
  14. Tholen B. Machiavelli’s Lessons for Public Administration, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 38:2, 2016. –P. 101-114.