##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 151 Download : 165

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The paper aims to uproot the male-oriented Indian social culture of colonizing women with a vision of distorting the ontological construction of gender identity and battling against the androcentric culture of India by two major female characters of Manju Kapur’s novel, Custody (2011), Shagun and Ishita. Shagun and Ishita not only get divorced but also remarry other men to signify how modern women are capable of challenging the patriarchal Indian culture for their liberation and identity. To survey the aftermath consequences of suppression on women, divorce, and remarriage, feminist theory, with special focus on the theorization of French feminists such as Simon de Beauvoir, Christine Delphy, Sheila Ruth, is used as a research tool. And the qualitative, analytical, explorative research method is used to test the hypothesized issues. The major finding of the research paper is that though Kapur is successful to resist the patriarchal society that attempts to subjugate women, patriarchal domination is still stimulating modern society and women are facing problems due to uncertainties of matrimony, infertility. It is expected that researchers intending to probe into the creative world of Kapur with a feminist approach can obtain this work as a reference.

Keywords

Authority Essentialism Oppression Patrilineal

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Bimal Kishore Shrivastwa. (2022). Distortion of the Ontological Construction of Gender in Kapur’s Custody. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 9, 144–151. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjm/article/view/2021

References

  1. Akbar, A. (2011, March 11). Custody by Manju Kapur. Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/custody-by-manju-kapur-2238058.html
  2. Anita & Sharma, R. (2021). Identity crisis: An analysis of Manju Kapur’s custody. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 14 (1), 2421–2427. https://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJFGCN/article/view/36552/20156
  3. Banerji, M. (2011, February 27). Custody by Manju Kapur- review. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/feb/27/custody-manju-kapur-review
  4. Beauvoir, S. d. (1983). The second sex. (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). Penguin. (Original work published 1953).
  5. Chanthiramathi, V., & Rashmi, M. (2016). Perspectives of culture and conflicts in Manju Kapur’s custody. Outreach: A Multi-disciplinary Refereed Journal, IX, 45-49. https://www.voccoutreach.in/vol9/8.pdf.
  6. Connell, R. E. (200). Masculinities. University of California Press.
  7. Delphy, C. (1984). Close to home: A materialist analysis of women’s oppression. (D. L. Leonard, Trans.), 61.
  8. Dodiya, J. (2006). Indian women novelists, Sarup & Sons Publishers, 2.
  9. Ehrenriech, B. (2020, May 4). What is socialist feminism? Feministezine.com. https:// www. feministezine.com.
  10. Engels, F. (1902). The origin of the family, private property and the state. (E. Untermann, Trans). Charles H. Kerr & Co.. (Original work published 1884), 9.
  11. Ghosh, A. (2010, December). Arpita Ghosh-Indian feminism. EBSCOHOSTconnection, 34, 22. http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/64926765/arpita-ghosh-indian-feminism
  12. Greil, A. L., Belvins, K. S., & McQuillian, J. (2020, January). The experience of infertility: A review of recent literature. Social Health Illn, 32 (1), 140-162. doi.10.111/9.1467-9566.2009.01213.x.
  13. Guillaumin, C. (1996). The practice of power and belief in nature. In D. Leonard & L. Adkins (Ed.), Sex in question: French materialist feminism. Taylor and Francois, 73.
  14. Jackson, L. J., & Fife, S. T. (2018). The impact of parental divorce: The relationship between social support and confidence levels in young adults. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 59 (2), 123-140. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10502556.2017.1402652
  15. Jaidev (2013). Problematizing feminism. In Sushila Singh (Ed.), Feminism and Recent Fiction in English, 21.
  16. Janabandhu, R. M. (2014, July). Feminism in the novel of Manju Kapur. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(7), 100-103. https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijsell/v2-i7/11.pdf
  17. Jayasudha, T. & Hema, M. (2020). Exploration of the inner self in Manju Kapur’s custody. Journal of Critical Reviews. 7(17), 1631-1641. http://www.jcreview.com/fulltext/197-1594220048.pdf
  18. Kale, S. (2010, December). Manju Kapur’s custody: a tale of exasperation in self-attainment. Online International Journal Interdisciplinary Research, VI, 247. https://oiijj.org/oiirj/jan2016-special-issue/39.pdf.
  19. Kapur, M. (2011). Custody. Random House India.
  20. Maji, P. (2013, August). Feminism in Manju Kapur’s custody. The Criterion: An International Journal in English, 4 (4), 1. https://www,the-criterion.com
  21. Moi, T. (1985). Sexual/textual politics: Feminist literary theory. Routledge.
  22. Niteeka & Singh, A. (2019). Manju Kapur’s custody: A search for new space. International Journal of Higher Education and Research, 9 (2), 312-319.
  23. Peterson, A. (2003, July). Research on men and masculinities: Some implications of recent theory for future work. Men and Masculinities, 6 (1), 54–69. doi:10.1177/1097184X02250843.
  24. Rich, A. (1995). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. Rutgers University Press.
  25. Roy, H. (2019, September 20). Indian women in english. Englitmail. https://www.englitmail.com/2019/09/indian-women-novelists-in-english.html
  26. Ruth, S. (1990). Issues in feminism: An introduction to women’s studies. Mayfield Publishing Company, 45-47.
  27. Saharan, A. (2018, July 1). Treatment of infidelity and infertility in Manju Kapur’s custody. The Journal for English Language and Literary Studies, II (I). www.tjells.com
  28. Samuel, R. (2020, August 19). India’s greatest shame: The unwanted’ girl child. Outlook. https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/opinion-indias-greatest-shame-the-unwanted-girl-child/348399
  29. Scur, R. (2009, April). The immigrant by Manju Kapur: Review. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/bookreviews/5163783/The-Immigrant-by-Manju-Kapur-review.html
  30. Sharma, P., & Singh, A. (2018, July). A critical study of changing Indian marital relations in Manju Kapur’s custody. Impressions, XII (II), 1-5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343064102_A_Critical_Study_of_Changing_Indian_Marital_Relations_in_Manju_Kapur%27s_Custody
  31. Sheldon, R., Widdoson, P., & Peter, B. (2005). A readers’ guide to contemporary literary theory. Longman
  32. Showalter, E. (1999). Beyond the female aesthetics: Contemporary women novelists. A literature of their own: British women novelists from Bronte to Lessing. Princeton UP, 367-368
  33. Singh, K. (2013). Separated and divorced women in India. Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
  34. Susan, M. (1995). Feminism. In Honderik Ted (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford UP, 291-294.
  35. Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide. Routledge, 96.
  36. Walton, J. (2011, February 14). Custody by Manju Kapur. Dailymail.com. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/books/article-1360262/Manju-Kapur-CUSTODY.html
  37. Whatney, S. (1986). The banality of gender. Oxford Literary Review, 8(1/2), 13-21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43934583.