##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The ideas of a world-famous novel with its mysticism and terror can be difficult to swallow when seen on the surface. However, the thoughts of Mary Shelley are immediately known when the text has understood in a contrapuntal light. In light of colonialism, the question of colonialism is arose. In the English canon, Frankenstein takes on a much deeper meaning. It's not the novel that is limited to wonderful stories on holiday; no, instead, it reveals the issues in both colonized and colonizer people minds. This story is intertwined in the structure of our times and not in a far-flung world. Frankenstein is a story that challenges the convictions and ideologies of a whole world and culture. This article will explain appeared and conventions of colonial literature—also, Victor Frankenstein and Lavenza and monster
Keywords
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
- Ball, J. C.(2001). "Imperial Monstrosities: Frankenstein, The West Indians, And V.S. Naipaul". Web. 12 May 2015. Pg. 31-58.
- Bhabha, Homi. K.(2012). "On Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse". Critical Theory: A Reader for Literary and Cultural Studies. Ed. Robert Dale Parker. New York: Oxford University Press, Pg. 668-675. Pdf.
- Burton, R. F. (1913).Personal Narrative of a Pilgrimage to Al-Medinah and Meccah: Vol II. Ed. Lady Burton. London G. Bell and Sons. Pdf.
- Bayaar, T.(2018). Frankenstein gender in the monster. Research gate. Pamukkale university. N.325857498. Printer.
- Francisco. J. G.(2014). Frankenstein by Mary Shelley The "Female Monster": Exploration of femininity in the culture and Novel. Universidad Completeness de Madrid. Ankara. Pdf.
- Haidee, K.(2000). Desire, gender, power, language: a psychoanalytic reading of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Liberator. Potchefstroom University for CHE. Printer.
- Dupre, K. (2015). Imperial Monstrosity in Frankenstein. Jordan Brown. EH 469. Pg. 14-16.
- McClintock, A.(1995). Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York: Routledge. Pdf.
- Nadia, M. (2016). The Monster's Roar: Ethos of verse Colonization in Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein". The Literary Herald an International Reference English e-Journal. ISSN: 2454-3365.
- Said, E. W. (2012). "Narrative and Social Space". Critical Theory: A Reader for Literary and Cultural Studies. Ed. Robert date Parker. New York: Oxford University Press. 718-734. Pdf.
- ….,(1979). Orientalism. New York: Random House. Pdf.
- Shelley, M.(1992). Frankenstein. London: Penguin Books, Pg. 31-217. Pdf.
- Spivak, G. C.(2012). "Can the subaltern Speak? Speculations on Widow-Sacrifice". Critical Theory: A Reader for Literary and Cultural Studies. Ed. Robert Parker. New York: Oxford University Press..675-693. pdf.
- ---.(1985)." Three Woman's texts and A Critique of Imperialism". Critical Inquiry . JOSTOR. Web 30 Nov. 2014.Pg. 243-261.
- Sawyer, R.(2007). "Mary Shelley and Shakespeare: Monstrous". South Atlantic Review. JSTOR. Web. 12 May 2015.Pg. 15-31.
- Lyotand, J. F.(1991). The Inhuman: Reflections on Time. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby. Stanford University Press. Pdf.