##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 45 Download : 39

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The article analyzes the experience of foreign countries in the use of non-custodial sentences in connection with the liberalization of criminal law. Proposals and recommendations have been put forward to improve the effectiveness of non-custodial sentences.

Keywords

Verbal sanction reprimand parole limitation of civil rights

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Toksanbaeva Ayjamal Mangytbay kizi. (2022). Issues Applying Penalties Not Related with Incarceration in Some Foreign Countries. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 6, 256–259. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjm/article/view/1111

References

  1. Criminal Executive law: The textbook / Under the editorship of I. V. Shmarova. – M., 1998. – S. 13.
  2. UN standard minimum rules for non custodial measures (Tokyo rules, 1990) / criminal Executive code of the Russian Federation. With appendices, indexes of judicial practice. – M., 1997.
  3. Peter Tak. Alternatives to Prison in Europe, in Prison Populations and Penal Policy in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, Swedish Prison and probation Service, 1998. – Р. 54
  4. Peter Tak. Alternatives to Prison in Europe, in Prison Populations and Penal Policy in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, Swedish Prison and probation Service, 1998. – Р. 104