The 21st century is characterized by different trends, including advanced digital technologies and services. These technologies comprise advanced telecommunication systems that enhance communication between different parties thus, ease of information awareness between people in different locations. For this reason, telecommunication systems have been used by government agencies and NGOs to help promote the practice of democracy and respect for human rights. Countries such as Iraq have been
identified as entities that use telecommunication systems to positively and negatively encourage the practice of human rights and democracy. This study aims to discuss the suitability of telecommunication systems in the practice of democracy and human rights in Iraq. The paper has used the case study data collection method to acquire an in-depth and multi-faceted understanding of the complex issue in its reallife context. The results show that telecommunications have been used often to ensure democracy and
human rights are effectively practised. The paper's results comprise 4 case studies that show the positive use of telecommunication systems in the practice of human rights and democracy within a given country.
In contrast, two case studies show examples of negative use of telecommunication systems based on retaining control or governmental power. Lastly, one case study shows how telecommunication systems can be important in regions where governance, democracy and human rights are not intact. The study's findings show that telecommunication systems benefit governments and citizens by ensuring that democracy and human rights are practised appropriately.


Telecommunication systems democracy human rights


How to Cite
Thimar Falih Yasir Al Sharify, & Haroon Rashid Hammood Al Dallal. (2022). The suitability of telecommunication (wired and wireless) systems in the practice of democracy and human rights in Iraq. Texas Journal of Engineering and Technology, 12, 3–13. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjet/article/view/2353


  1. ALAANY, S. S. A. (2016). The Progress and obstacles of implementing and improving E-Government in Iraq (Doctoral dissertation, KDI School).
  2. Albadri, R. F., Alsallal, M. D., Abdulsatar, A. S., & Abbas, Q. H. (2020). The Readiness of E-Government Adoption in Iraq: A Case Study of Al-Muthanna Province. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(04).
  3. Al-Saqaf, W. (2016). Internet censorship circumvention tools: Escaping the control of the Syrian regime. Media and Communication, 4(1), 39-50.
  4. Ams, S. (2021). Blurred lines: the convergence of military and civilian uses of AI & data use and its impact on liberal democracy. International Politics, 1-18.
  5. Artz, L. (2015). Global entertainment media: A critical introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
  6. BOATENG, R. (2015). Democracy Promotion and US Hegemony: A Case Study of Iraq.
  7. Boyd-Barrett, O. (2015). The Evolving Business Models of Network News?. In Media and Left (pp. 139-165). Brill.
  8. Chomsky, N. (2015). Culture of terrorism. Haymarket Books.
  9. Clement, A. (2017). Addressing Mass State Surveillance Through Transparency and Network Sovereignty, within a Framework of International Human Rights Law-a Canadian Perspective. Clement, A.(2017). Addressing mass state surveillance through transparency and network sovereignty, within a framework of international human rights law–a Canadian perspective. Published in both English and Chinese in the Chinese Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies.
  10. Diamond, L., Plattner, M. F., & Walker, C. (Eds.). (2016). Authoritarianism goes global: The challenge to democracy. JhU Press.
  11. Dolunay, A., Kasap, F., & Keçeci, G. (2017). Freedom of Mass Communication in the Digital Age in the Case of the Internet:“Freedom House” and the USA Example. Sustainability, 9(10), 1739.
  12. Human Rights Watch. (2016). World Report 2016: Events of 2015. Policy Press.
  14. Karagianni, I. (2016). Let’s boost democracy and human rights: the use of the social media and its impact on the venture of enhancing democracy and human rights in an era of social turbulence (Doctoral dissertation).
  15. Mainwaring, S., & Aldrich, R. J. (2021). The secret empire of signals intelligence: GCHQ and the persistence of the colonial presence. The International History Review, 43(1), 54-71.
  16. McChesney, R. W. (2016). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New Press, The.
  17. Milanovic, M. (2015). Human rights treaties and foreign surveillance: Privacy in the digital age. Harv. Int'l LJ, 56, 81.
  18. Nieminen, H. (2016). A radical democratic reform of media regulation in response to three levels of crisis. Javnost-The Public, 23(1), 56-69.
  19. Orji, U. J. (2019). International Telecommunications Law and Policy. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  20. Peng, D. (2017). International Communications in China’s Broadcast Media. In International Communication Strategies of Chinese Radio and TV Networks (pp. 83-150). Springer, Singapore.
  21. Pilger, J. (2016). The new rulers of the world. Verso Books.
  22. Price, M. E. (2015). Free expression, globalism, and the new strategic communication. Cambridge University Press.
  23. Romanosky, S., Libicki, M. C., Winkelman, Z., & Tkacheva, O. (2015). Internet Freedom Software and Illicit Activity: Supporting Human Rights Without Enabling Criminals. Rand Corporation.
  24. Samoriski, J. H. (2019). Global Communication Law. Global Communication: A Multicultural Perspective, 102.
  25. Scholte, J. A. (2017). Globalization: A critical introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  26. Thussu, D. K. (2018). International communication: Continuity and change. Bloomsbury Publishing.