##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the effect of supplementing broiler diets with different levels of sodium and calcium butyrate on certain histological and microbial traits. This study was conducted in the poultry field of the Department of Animal Production at the College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences / University of Baghdad (Baghdad, Iraq) during November - December (2020) in a total of 308 one-day-old chicken utilized in the study, and each treatment had three replicates consisting of 10 chicks each. Duodenal villi height increased significantly (p


<0.05) for treatments T2, T3, T4, and T5, villi thickness increased significantly (p><0.05) for treatment T3, and crypt depth increased significantly (p><0.05) for treatment T2. Treatment T2 significantly increased villi height and treatment T5 significantly increased villi thickness in the jejunum, in comparison to the other treatments. In the ileum, treatment T2 resulted in significantly greater increases in villi height, treatment T6 in villi thickness, and treatment T4 in crypt depth compared to the other treatments. In the duodenum and jejunum, there were no statistically significant variations in the numbers of E. coli and Lactobacilli bacteria, but in the ileum, the number of E. coli increased significantly in treatments T3 and T4. In this respect, lactobacilli did not differ noticeably. >

Keywords

Lactobacilli Chicken Ileum Duodenum

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mayada Saeed Sultan. (2023). Broiler Microbiological and Histological Response to Diets Varying in Sodium and Calcium Butyrate. Texas Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 17, 71–77. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjabs/article/view/4164

References

  1. Abd El-Wahab, A., Mahmoud, R. E., Ahmed, M. F., and Salama, M. F. (2019). Effect of dietary supplementation of calcium butyrate on growth performance, carcass traits, intestinal health, and pro‐inflammatory cytokines in Japanese quails. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 103(6), 1768-1775.
  2. Abdelqader, A., and Al-Fataftah, A. R. (2016).Effect of dietary butyric acid on performance, intestinal morphology, microflora composition and intestinal recovery of heat-stressed broilers. Livestock Science, 183, 78-83.
  3. Ahsan, U., Cengiz, Ö., Raza, I., Kuter, E., Chacher, M. F. A., Iqbal, Z., and Çakir, S. (2016). Sodium butyrate in chicken nutrition: the dynamics of performance, gut microbiota, gut morphology, and immunity. World's Poultry Science Journal, 72(2), 265-275.
  4. Al-Gharban, H.A.A.J. (2017). Seroepidemiological detection and culture utilization for diagnosis of carrier horses and donkeys with strangles. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 1(28), 649-660.
  5. Canani, R. B., Di Costanzo, M., Leone, L., Pedata, M., Meli, R., and Calignano, A. (2011). Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG, 17(12), 1519.
  6. Castanon, J. I. R. (2007). History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in European poultry feeds. Poultry science, 86(11), 2466-2471.
  7. Coban, H. B. (2020). Organic acids as antimicrobial food agents: Applications and microbial productions. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 43(4), 569-591.
  8. Elnesr, S. S., Ropy, A., and Abdel-Razik, A. H. (2019).Effect of dietary sodium butyrate supplementation on growth, blood biochemistry, haematology and histomorphometry of intestine and immune organs of Japanese quail. Animal, 13(6), 1234-1244.
  9. Hajati, H., and Rezaei, M. (2010).The application of prebiotics in poultry production. Int J Poult Sci, 9(3), 298-304.
  10. Hassan, H. M. A., Mohamed, M. A., Youssef, A. W., and Hassan, E. R. (2010).Effect of using organic acids to substitute antibiotic growth promoters on performance and intestinal microflora of broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 23(10), 1348-1353.
  11. Hodin, R. (2000). Maintaining gut homeostasis: The butyrate–NF-κB connection. Gastroenterology, 118(4), 798-801.
  12. Hu, Y. S., Guo, Y. G., Dominko, R., Gaberscek, M., Jamnik, J., and Maier, J. (2007). Improved electrode performance of porous LiFePO4 using RuO2 as an oxidic nanoscale interconnect. Advanced Materials, 19(15), 1963-1966.
  13. Jung, T. H., Park, J. H., Jeon, W. M., and Han, K. S. (2015). Butyrate modulates bacterial adherence on LS174T human colorectal cells by stimulating mucin secretion and MAPK signaling pathway. Nutrition Research and Practice, 9(4), 343-349.
  14. Khan, S. H., and Iqbal, J. (2016). Recent advances in the role of organic acids in poultry nutrition. Journal of applied animal research, 44(1), 359-369.
  15. Kinoshita, M., Suzuki, Y., and Saito, Y. (2002). Butyrate reduces colonic paracellular permeability by enhancing PPARγ activation. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 293(2), 827-831.
  16. Leeson, S., Namkung, H., Antongiovanni, M., and Lee, E. H. (2005).Effect of butyric acid on the performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Poultry science, 84(9), 1418-1422.
  17. Lutful Kabir, S. M. (2009). The role of probiotics in the poultry industry. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 10(8), 3531-3546.
  18. Martínez, E. A., Babot, J. D., Lorenzo-Pisarello, M. J., Apella, M. C., and Chaia, A. P. (2016). Feed supplementation with avian Propionibacterium acidipropionici contributes to mucosa development in early stages of rearing broiler chickens. Beneficial Microbes, 7(5), 687-698.
  19. Nagy, A. S.2007. Poultry Health Administration, Al Noor Publishing House.
  20. National Research Council (NRC). 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington.
  21. Sikandar, A., Zaneb, H., Younus, M., Masood, S., Aslam, A., Ashraf, S., and Rehman, H. (2017). Protective effect of sodium butyrate on growth performance, immune responses, and gut mucosal morphometry in Salmonella-challenged broiler chickens. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 19, 1387-1393.
  22. Singer, R. S., and Hofacre, C. L. (2006).Potential impacts of antibiotic use in poultry production. Avian diseases, 50(2), 161-172.
  23. Tokić, V., Lazarević, M., Sinovec, Z., and Tokić, A. (2007). The influence of different feed additives to performances and immune response in broiler chicken. Acta Veterinaria-Beograd, 57(2-3), 217-229.
  24. Warnecke, T., and Gill, R. T. (2005).Organic acid toxicity, tolerance, and production in Escherichia coli biorefining applications. Microbial cell factories, 4(1), 1-8.
  25. Yang, Y., Iji, P. A., and Choct, M. (2009). Dietary modulation of gut microflora in broiler chickens: a review of the role of six kinds of alternatives to in-feed antibiotics. World's Poultry Science Journal, 65(1), 97-114.
  26. Zhou, D. A., Pan, Q., Xin, F. Z., Zhang, R. N., He, C. X., Chen, G. Y., and Fan, J. G. (2017). Sodium butyrate attenuates high-fat diet-induced steatohepatitis in mice by improving gut microbiota and gastrointestinal barrier. World journal of gastroenterology, 23(1), 60.
  27. Zhou, Z. Y., Packialakshmi, B., Makkar, S. K., Dridi, S., and Rath, N. C. (2014).Effect of butyrate on immune response of a chicken macrophage cell line. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 162(1-2), 24-32.