##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at the Agricultural Research Station of the College of Agriculture - University of Basrah during the winter season of 2021-2022 to study the effect of adding different rates of triple superphosphate fertilizer compared to Nano-phosphate fertilizer on the vegetative growth components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Triple super phosphate fertilizer at rates 0, 30, 60 and 90 kg P ha-1 was applied to soil at planting, while Nano-phosphate fertilizer at rates 0, 5, 10 and 15 kg P ha-1 was added as a foliar on the plant at the stages of branching and elongation, Height of the plant and flag leaf area at the flowering stage, the number of days from planting to 50% heading, and from 50% heading to full maturity, and the dry weight of the plant was measured at the 50% heading stage. The results showed no significant differences in the studied traits (plant height, flag leaf area and The number of days from planting to 50% heading and from 50% heading to full maturity and dry weight) between the two sources of phosphate fertilizer despite the added amount of Nano-fertilizer representing (1/4) of the amount of triple superphosphate fertilizer, and the results also indicated that the increase in phosphorous rates from of 0 to 90 kg of triple superphosphate and from 0 to 10 kg of P ha-1 of Nano phosphate fertilizer led to an increase in growth parameters, but increasing Nano fertilizer to 15 kg of P ha-1 reduced in all growth parameters. The results also indicated the superiority of the Ibaa99 cultivar in the characteristics (plant height and number of days from planting to 50% heading and dry weight), while the Jad cultivar was superior in traits (flag leaf area and number of days from 50% heading to full maturity).

Keywords

traits heading cultivar superior

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Hussein Yassin Jappar Al-Murshidy, & Abdul-Mahdi Salih Al-Ansari. (2022). Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown in calcareous soils to Nano-phosphate and triple super phosphate fertilizers. Texas Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 9, 1–8. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjabs/article/view/2413

References

  1. Al-Shammari, A. J., & Al-Ansari, A. M. S. Response Growth and Productivity of Cultivars Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) to Fertilization by Nano and Mineral Nitrogen. International Journal of Health Sciences, (I), 8205-8216.
  2. AL-Abody, M. A. K., AbdWahid, M. A., & Jamel, F. A. (2021). Effect of Foliar Applicalion of Nano-fertilizer of Iron on Growth and Biological Yield of Varieties Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). American Journal of Life Science Researches, 9(1), 8-17.
  3. Al-Juthery, H. W., Yousif, S. A. A., Lahmod, N. R., Alhasan, A. S., Tiamooz, S. H., & Musa, R. F. (2022, July). Response Wheat to Spray Some of Synthetic Nano Fertilizers. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1060, No. 1, p. 012030). IOP Publishing.
  4. Almwsaly mzfr ’ahamd dawd -alkaml fy al’asmdah waltsmyd (thalyl altrbah walnbat walma’)- Dar al kotob al ilmiyah - Beirut - Lebanon – 2018- part 4 page 40-49
  5. Al-Shamary, M. M., & Huthily, K. H. (2019). Effect of Micronutrients Application and Spraying Yeast Extract on Yield and Yield Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32(2), 95-105.
  6. Anees, A. H. A., & Al-Zubaidy, K. M. (2017). STABILITY ANALYSIS IN SOME BREAD WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) GENOTYPES. IRAQ JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 22(10).‏
  7. Burhan, M. G., & Al-Hassan, S. A. (2019). Impact of nano NPK fertilizers to correlation between productivity, quality and flag leaf of some bread wheat varieties. The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Science, 50, 1-7.
  8. Chhipa, H. (2017). Nanofertilizers and nanopesticides for agriculture. Environmental chemistry letters, 15(1), 15-22
  9. Davari, M. R., Bayat Kazazi, S., & Akbarzadeh Pivehzhani, O. (2017). Nanomaterials: implications on agroecosystem. In Nanotechnology (pp. 59-71). Springer, Singapore.
  10. Ditta, A., & Arshad, M. (2016). Applications and perspectives of using nanomaterials for sustainable plant nutrition. Nanotechnology Reviews, 5(2), 209-229.
  11. Elsahookie, M. M., Cheyed, S. H., & Dawood, A. A. (2021). Characteristics of Whole Wheat Grain Bread Quality. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 12(1), 593-597
  12. Hanon Mohsen, K., Alrubaiee, S. H., & ALfarjawi, T. M. (2022). Response of wheat varieties, Triticum aestivum L., to spraying by iron nano-fertilizer. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20(4), 775-783.
  13. Iqbal, M. A. (2019). Nano-fertilizers for sustainable crop production under changing climate: a global perspective. Sustainable crop production, 8, 1-13.‏
  14. Jaddoa, K. A., Zeboon, N. H., & Baqer, H. A. A. (2017). Effect of Tillers Removal and nitrogen levels on some growth traits of two bread wheat varieties. The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Science, 48(1
  15. Liu, R., & Lal, R. (2014). Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max). Scientific reports, 4(1), 1-6.
  16. ‏Rai, M. et al. (2015) ‘Nanotechnologies in food and agriculture’, Nanotechnologies in Food and Agriculture, (January), pp. 1–347. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14024-7.
  17. Reis, H. P. G., Giroto, A. S., Guimarães, G. G. F., Putti, F. F., Pavinato, P. S., Teles, A. P., ... & Fernandes, D. M. (2022). Role of Slow-Release Phosphate Nanofertilizers in Forage Nutrition and Phosphorus Lability. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology.
  18. zhu, J., Li, M., & Whelan, M. (2018). Phosphorus activators contribute to legacy phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 612, 522-537