##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The experiment was applied in two successive winter seasons 2020 and 2021, with the aim of studying the growth and yield of two cultivars of bean, the Turkish variety A1 )Bakla sakiz) and the Spanish A2 variety (Histal), and three levels of NPK mineral fertilizer 20, 20, 20 and the total quantity was 200 kg.ha-1 S1 no addition and S2 adding 50% of the total fertilizer and S3 adding 100%, and three levels of biochar ( corn stalks and poultry manure) H1 no addition and H2 adding 7 tons.ha-1 and H3 adding 14 tons.ha-1 and three replicates using a design. (R.C.B.D). The results of the study showed significant differences between cultivars, fertilizer and biochar and the interaction between them, and for all the studied traits two seasons, The Spanish cultivar was significantly superior to the Turkish cultivar in terms of plant height, leaf area, chlorophyll content in leaves, weight of 100 seeds and total seed yield, except that the number of branches per plant did not differ significantly two seasons, The S3 level was significantly distinguished in all growth traits, weight of 100 seeds two seasons and a recipe for yield for the 2021 season, While the level S2 was significantly superior in the trait of the achievement for the 2020 season, the level H3 was significantly superior in all the characteristics of the study two seasons, The binary interaction between cultivars, manure, cultivars and charcoal was significant, as the two combinations A2S3 and A2H3 excelled in all study characteristics two seasons, The triple interaction between cultivars, fertilizer and charcoal was significant, as the two combinations A2S2H3 and A2S3H3 were superior in plant height, chlorophyll and yield two seasons and 100-seed weight trait for the 2020 season, While the combinations A1S3H2, A1S3H3, A2S3H2 and A2S3H3 were significantly distinguished in the characteristics of number of branches on the plant and leaf area two seasons.

Keywords

Plant Height Branches Leaf Area Grain Yield

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Qotaiba.Saleh. Sheikh, Abdulsalam Rajab Ahmed Al-Jumaily, & Jassim. Mohammed. Aziz. (2022). Test of the Effectiveness of Biochar and Mineral Fertilizer on The Growth and Yield of Two Broad Bean Vicia Faba L. Texas Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 4, 42–57. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjabs/article/view/1705

References

  1. Agegnehu, G., A, M.B., P, N.N., and Michael, I.B., 2016. Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar– compost for soil quality, maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical agricultural soil. Science of the Total Environment 543:295-306.
  2. Ali, I. He, L. U, S. Q, Z. W, S. I, W. M, F. S, T. X, Y. and Luo, Y., 2020. Biochar addition coupled with nitrogen fertilization impacts on soil quality, crop productivity, and nitrogen uptake under double- cropping system. Food Energy Secur.9, e208.
  3. Alkheero, N. A, M.T.M, M.A.Kh, A. A.and Alkheero.,2019. The use of locally produced biochar in improving soil physical characteristics of two different textures soil in Ninivah. Journal of kirkuk University for Agricultural Sciences. Vol (10) No. (3):32-39.
  4. Alotaibi, K.D.and Schoenau, J.J., 2019. Addition of Biochar to a Sandy Desert Soil: Effect on Crop Growth, Water Retention and Selected Properties. Agronomy, 9, 327.
  5. Alsalim, H.A.A.,2019. Assessment of azotobacter chroococcum’s ability to produce hydrolytic enzymes and enhance growth of Vicia faba L. Baghdad Science Journal. Vol.16(1):34-39.
  6. Ayshooa, L. M. H. Boutros., 2020. Effect of Nitrogenous Nano-Hydroxyapatite Fertilizer and Urea on the Growth and Yield of two Cultivars of Bean (Vicia faba L.). Master Thesis - Department of Field Crops - College of Agriculture and Forestry - University of Mosul.
  7. Aziz, W. S., 2016. Effect of spraying seaweed extracts on the growth and yield of two cultivars of bean (Vicia faba L.). Tikrit University Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 16(1):18-87.
  8. Bozorgi, H, R. E., A.and Moradi., M., 2011. The effects of bio, mineral nitrogen fertilization and foliar zinc spraying on yield and yield components of faba bean. World Applied Sciences Journal .13(6):1409- 1414.
  9. Chen, J. L, Y. W, S. R, A. Y, G.and Sun, X., 2017. Magnesium fertilizer-induced increase of symbiotic microorganisms improves forage growth and quality. J. Agric. Food Chem., 65, 3253–3258.
  10. CSO., (2018). Directorate of Agricultural Statistics - Central Bureau of Statistic Iraq.
  11. Dhari, S. E., 2016. Effect of Organic Fertilizers from Plant Sources (Weeds) on the Growth and Yield of some Bean Cultivars and their Companion Weeds. Master's thesis, College of Agriculture - University of Baghdad.
  12. Dhari, S. E. and M. H. K. Al-Baldawi., 2017. Response of different bean cultivars to plant-based organic fertilizers. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 48 (4): 1148-1157.
  13. Egamberdieva, D. Alaylar. B, K. A, W. S.and Bellingrath- Kimura. S.D., 2021. Biochar for improving soil biological properties and mitigating salt stress in plants on salt-affected soils. Communication in Plant and Soil Sciences, 140-152.
  14. Egamberdieva, D. L, L. M, H. W, S. and Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D., 2019.Soil amendment with different maize biochars improves chickpea different moisture levels by improving symbiotic performance with Mesorhizobium ciceri and soil biochemical properties to varying degrees. Front. Microb., 10, 2423.
  15. Etemadi, F. B, A. V, H, M. Z, O.R. P, Y. 2018a.Nutrient accumulation in faba bean varieties. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 1–10.
  16. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.,2012. The zinc Homeostasis Network of Land Plants. In Sinclair, S.A., and U. Kramer, (Ed). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1823:1553-1567.
  17. Galloway, J. N, W. W, L. A, L. A. M, B. A, E. J. W., 2014. Nitrogen footprints: Past, present and future. Environmental Research Letters, 9, 115003.
  18. Gonzaga, M.I.S, M. C, A. A.Q, C. J.I.T, A. K.R., 2018. Positive and negative effects of biochar from coconut husks, orange bagasse and pine wood chips on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and nutrition. CATENA 162:414-420.
  19. Haling, R.E.Y, Z. S, N. C, R.A. S, A. R, M.H. S, R.J., 2016. Growth and root dry matter allocation by pasture legumes and a grass with contrasting external critical phosphorus requirements. Plant Soil, 407: 67–79.
  20. Han, L. R, K.S. S, K. S, H. W, Z. L, J.A. X, B., 2016. New evidence for high sorption capacity of hydrochar for hydrophobic organic pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 13274–13282.
  21. Hussain, M. F, M. N. A, Al-Sadi. A. M, S. Z M, Alghamdi.S. S, A. U, O.Y. S, S. K. H. M. 2017. Biochar for crop production: Potential benefits and risks. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 17, 685–716.
  22. Ibrahim, A. A. 2019. The Easy Reference in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Dar Al-Yazuri Scientific for Media and Publishing. p: 53
  23. Ippolito, J.A, S, K.A, N.J.M, L. R.D, C, K.B., 2014. Biochar elemental composition and factor’s infuencing nutrient retention. Biochar Environ Manag Sci Technol.;137–62.
  24. Isley, C.B. d. S, Luiz. A. F, F, R. A.,2017. Growth and production of common bean fertilized with biochar. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v.47: 11.
  25. Issa, T. A., 1990. The Physiology of Crop Plants (Translator). faculty of Agriculture. Baghdad University. p. p: 493.
  26. Jan, M.T. K. J.M.K. A. A, M. S. M, N. N.,2010. Wheat nitrogen indices response to nitrogen source and application time.Pak.J. Bot. 42, 6, 4267- 4279.
  27. Jones, J. B., 2012. Plant Nutrition and Soil Fertility Manual, Second Edition. pub: CRC Press; 2nd edition PP: 304.
  28. Khaled, M., 2018. Agricultural fertilizers, their uses and harms. The Arab Scientific Archive. p. 5-8.
  29. Lehmann, J. J. S., 2015. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation. Routledge, UK.
  30. Lehmann, J. R, M.C. T, J.; M, C.A. H, W.C.and Crowley, D.,2011. Biochar effects on soil biota—A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 1812–1836.
  31. Makoudi, B. K, A. M, M. A, L. D, O.B, M.and Ghoulam, C., 2018. Phosphorus deficiency increases nodule phytase activity of faba bean–rhizobia symbiosis. Acta Physiol Plant, 40: 63.
  32. Mohamed, I. El-Meihy, R. A, M. C, F. R, D., 2017. Interactive effects of biochar and micronutrients on faba bean growth, symbiotic performance, and soil properties. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 180, 729–738.
  33. Mostafa, F.A. and Kh. A.H. S.,2019. Effect of different types of biochar on soil chemical properties, microbial community, pathogenic fungi and faba bean productivity. Scientific Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1 (2): 72-87.
  34. Mouhanna, A. 2016. The Effect of Rates and Times of Sprying Bio-fertilizer on Growth and Yield of Peanut crop in Tartous. Al-Baath Univ. Jour. 38(23): 33-59.
  35. Multari, S. S, D. R, W.R. 2015. Potential of faba bean as future protein supply to partially replace meat intake in the human diet. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 14: 511–522.
  36. Nassauer, J. I., M. V. S and Donald. S., 2007. From the Corn Belt to the Gulf: Societal and Environmental Implications of Alternative Agricultural Futures (Rff Press). 1st edition. Pub: Routledge. PP: 272.
  37. Nelissen, V. R. T. H. D, S.J, R.G, B.P.,2012. Maize biochars Accelerate short-term soil nitrogen dynamics in a loamys and soil. Soil Biol Biochem.;55:20–27.
  38. Rajapaksha, A.U. C, S.S.T, D.C.W. Z, M. V, M. M, S.G, B. B, N.S. O, Y.S. 2016. Engineered/designer biochar for contaminant removal/immobilization from soil and water: Potential and implication of biochar modification. Chemosphere, 148, 276–291.
  39. Robb, S. J, S. A. A, A. D, P. T. C.,2020. Biochar's cost constraints are overcome in small-scale farming on tropical soils in lower-income countries. Land Degradation & Development, 31(13), 1713–1726.
  40. Sha, Z. L. Q, L. T, M. T,and Liu. X.,2019. Response of ammonia volatilization to biochar addition: a meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ;655:1387–96.
  41. Sinclair, T.R and Nogueira, M.A., 2018. Selection of host-plant genotype: the next step to increase grain legume N2 fixation activity. J Exp Bot, 69: 3523–3530.
  42. Syers, J.K, J. A.E, C. D., 2008. Efciency of soil and fertilizer phospho rus use: reconciling changing concepts of soil phosphorus behaviour with agronomic information. FAO Fertil Plant Nutr Bull.;18:128.
  43. Wali, E. M. A., 2016. Improved Methods for Leaf Area Prediction in Beans (Vicia faba L.). Tikrit Journal of Pure Sciences.21(4).:1-5. 57.
  44. Wali, F.N, M.B, M.A. A, M. A, Z. A, J.Alwahibi, M.S.and Elshikh, M.S. 2020.
  45. Formulation of biochar-based phosphorus fertilizer and its impact on both soil properties and chickpea growth performance. Sustainability 12, 9528.
  46. Wang, C.A, D.Y, X. I, A., 2018. Effects of bamboo biochar on soybean root nodulation in multi-elements contaminated soils. Ecotox Environ. Saf., 150, 62–69.
  47. Van, Z. L, R. T, H. D, K. S, R. J, C.A., 2015. Enhanced biological N2 fxation and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in an Acid soil following biochar addition: dissection of causal mechanisms. Plant Soil.;395(1–2):7–20.
  48. Xu, C. Y, H, H. Y, R. R. C, W. H, X. Z, W. H., 2015. Effect of biochar amendment on yield and photosynthesis of peanut on two types of soils. Enviromental Science & Pollution Research International, 22, 6112–6125.
  49. Yaqoub, D. Y. N., 2011. Technologies for the Production of Cereal Crops and Pulses (theoretical part). university of Damascus. p. s. :301.
  50. Yeboah, E.G, A.P, O. B, A. A, K.O.A., 2020. Method of biochar application affects growth, yield and nutrient uptake of cowpea. Open Agric., 5, 352– 360.
  51. Zhu, Q. K, L. S, Y. Y, X. Z, H. X, F. A, X., 2019. Effect of biochar on grain yield and leaf photosynthetic physiology of soybean cultivars with different phosphorus efficiencies. J. Integr. Agric., 18(10), 2242–2254.