Integrating Relevant Theories Of Critical Thinking With Pedagogical Principles And Practices In Teaching English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62480/jpip.2024.vol39.pp39-44Keywords:
Critical Thinking, Pedagogical Principles, English Language TeachingAbstract
The development of critical thinking skills is a cornerstone of higher education, vital for students to navigate the complexities of modern information landscapes and societal challenges. In the context of teaching English, fostering critical thinking enhances students' analytical abilities, interpretative skills, and capacity for nuanced communication. This paper explores the integration of prominent critical thinking theories with established pedagogical principles and practical classroom strategies to create a robust framework for English language teaching (ELT). By examining theoretical underpinnings such as Bloom's Taxonomy, the PaulElder Framework, and Vygotsky's Socio-Cultural Theory, this study outlines how these models can inform and enhance pedagogical approaches including inquiry-based learning, problembased learning (PBL), collaborative learning, and reflective practice. Additionally, the paper discusses practical applications in the classroom, such as textual analysis, debates, reflective writing, and the use of multimedia resources, to cultivate a dynamic and engaging learning environment. The challenges of integrating these approaches, including institutional support, teacher training, and cultural considerations, are also addressed. Through a comprehensive review and practical insights, this paper aims to provide educators with effective strategies to develop critical thinking skills in their English language students, ultimately contributing to their academic success and lifelong learning capabilities.
References
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
Andrews, R. (2014). The Role of Critical Thinking in Education. Educational Review, 66(1), 3-14.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals.
Longmans, Green. 4.Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning,
Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking: Learn the Tools the Best Thinkers Use. Pearson.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.
Harvard University Press.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
Andrews, R. (2014). The Role of Critical Thinking in Education. Educational Review, 66(1), 3-14.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals.
Longmans, Green.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking: Learn the Tools the Best Thinkers Use. Pearson.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.
Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC), the author (s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution).
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. the right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. the right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale,
4. the right to self-archive the article.








