##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 1031 Download : 13

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

Despite the fact that its effectiveness promotes more learners to be engaged, developing world faces challenges to make it more innovative in the process of teaching. It leads to some questions about whether or not this new approach is effective, what are the results in terms of learning outcomes, what difficulties can emerge and how they can be overcome. This paper examines these questions and discusses possible answers: increased student engagement and achievement, improved satisfaction and effectiveness are two different positive outcomes of blended learning approach for students whereas technological and learning environment challenges can be dealt with two varied ways: utilization of Learning Management System (LMS) and teachers’ competence to apply different techniques during the sessions.

Keywords

Blended learning Learning Management System online and offline mode of learning

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Shahzoda Umarova Iqboljon qizi. (2024). Blended Learning. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 37, 7–11. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/5576

References

  1. Angelino, L, Williams, F., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce
  2. attrition rates. The Journal of Educators Online, 4 (2), 1-14.
  3. Blocker, J. M., & Tucker, G. (2001). Using constructivist principles in designing and integrating
  4. online collaborative interactions.
  5. Clark, R., Kaw, A., Lou, Y., Scott, A., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2018). Evaluating blended and
  6. flipped instruction in numerical methods at multiple engineering schools. International Journal for
  7. the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 12(1), 1-16.
  8. Dias, S. B., & Diniz, J. A. (2014). Towards an Enhanced Learning Management System for Blended
  9. Learning in Higher Education Incorporating Distinct Learners’ Profiles.
  10. Dr. Enid Acosta-Tello (2015). Enhancing the online class: Effective use of synchronous interactive
  11. online instruction
  12. Dr. Digambar M. Ghodke (2021). LMS as an Effective Way for Overcoming the Barriers in Online
  13. Teaching-Learning and Evaluation Process: During Covid-19 and Beyond.
  14. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework,
  15. principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
  16. Harris, J., & Park, C. (2016). A case study on blended learning in engineering education.
  17. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) conference.
  18. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.648
  19. Huang, X. & Hsiao, E. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online
  20. Environment. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13 (1), 15-30.
  21. Jamieson, M. V., & Shaw, J. M. (2016). Online learning element design - Development and
  22. application experiences. In proceedings of the canadian engineering education association (CEEA)
  23. conference. https://doi.org/10.24908/pc`eea.v0i0.6498.
  24. Marc T. Kiviniami (2014), Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a
  25. graduate-level public health course.
  26. Mugenyi, Justice Kintu, Chang Zhu and Edmond Kagambe (2017), Blended learning effectiveness:
  27. the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes.
  28. Nurasma’ Shamsuddin, Jasber Kaur (2020), Students’ learning style and its effect on blended
  29. learning, does it matter?
  30. Phillip A. Olt (2018), Virtually there: Distant freshmen blended in classes through synchronous
  31. online education.
  32. Peter Augustine Lawler ( 2005), The problem of technology. Perspectives on political science,
  33. volume 34, number 3.
  34. Edward W. Younkins (2000), The freeman volume 50, Issue 1.
  35. Ward, M., Peters, G. & Shelley, K. (2010). Student and faculty perceptions of the quality of online
  36. learning experiences. International review of research in open and distance learning, 11 (3), 57-77.