##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Despite the fact that its effectiveness promotes more learners to be engaged, developing world faces challenges to make it more innovative in the process of teaching. It leads to some questions about whether or not this new approach is effective, what are the results in terms of learning outcomes, what difficulties can emerge and how they can be overcome. This paper examines these questions and discusses possible answers: increased student engagement and achievement, improved satisfaction and effectiveness are two different positive outcomes of blended learning approach for students whereas technological and learning environment challenges can be dealt with two varied ways: utilization of Learning Management System (LMS) and teachers’ competence to apply different techniques during the sessions.
Keywords
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
- Angelino, L, Williams, F., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce
- attrition rates. The Journal of Educators Online, 4 (2), 1-14.
- Blocker, J. M., & Tucker, G. (2001). Using constructivist principles in designing and integrating
- online collaborative interactions.
- Clark, R., Kaw, A., Lou, Y., Scott, A., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2018). Evaluating blended and
- flipped instruction in numerical methods at multiple engineering schools. International Journal for
- the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 12(1), 1-16.
- Dias, S. B., & Diniz, J. A. (2014). Towards an Enhanced Learning Management System for Blended
- Learning in Higher Education Incorporating Distinct Learners’ Profiles.
- Dr. Enid Acosta-Tello (2015). Enhancing the online class: Effective use of synchronous interactive
- online instruction
- Dr. Digambar M. Ghodke (2021). LMS as an Effective Way for Overcoming the Barriers in Online
- Teaching-Learning and Evaluation Process: During Covid-19 and Beyond.
- Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework,
- principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
- Harris, J., & Park, C. (2016). A case study on blended learning in engineering education.
- Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) conference.
- https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.648
- Huang, X. & Hsiao, E. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online
- Environment. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13 (1), 15-30.
- Jamieson, M. V., & Shaw, J. M. (2016). Online learning element design - Development and
- application experiences. In proceedings of the canadian engineering education association (CEEA)
- conference. https://doi.org/10.24908/pc`eea.v0i0.6498.
- Marc T. Kiviniami (2014), Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a
- graduate-level public health course.
- Mugenyi, Justice Kintu, Chang Zhu and Edmond Kagambe (2017), Blended learning effectiveness:
- the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes.
- Nurasma’ Shamsuddin, Jasber Kaur (2020), Students’ learning style and its effect on blended
- learning, does it matter?
- Phillip A. Olt (2018), Virtually there: Distant freshmen blended in classes through synchronous
- online education.
- Peter Augustine Lawler ( 2005), The problem of technology. Perspectives on political science,
- volume 34, number 3.
- Edward W. Younkins (2000), The freeman volume 50, Issue 1.
- Ward, M., Peters, G. & Shelley, K. (2010). Student and faculty perceptions of the quality of online
- learning experiences. International review of research in open and distance learning, 11 (3), 57-77.