##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

Laboratory classes play a crucial role in biology education, providing students with hands-on experiences and opportunities to apply theoretical concepts in practical settings. This scientific article explores various methods for using laboratory classes in the teaching of biology. It discusses the benefits of laboratory classes, the design of effective experiments, strategies for fostering inquiry-based learning, and the integration of technology in laboratory instruction. The article also addresses the challenges associated with laboratory classes and provides recommendations for enhancing their effectiveness in promoting student learning and engagement in biology education

Keywords

laboratory classes biology education hands-on experiences

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Majidova Muslima Pulatovna. (2023). Enhancing Biology Education: Effective Methods for Utilizing Laboratory Classes. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 21, 10–14. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/4070

References

  1. Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969.
  2. Barrow, L. H. (2006). A review of the effectiveness of hands-on laboratory activities in undergraduate biology. The American Biology Teacher, 68(3), 150-155.
  3. Bowen, C. W., & Roth, W. M. (2002). Hands-on minds-on: The impact of constructing and manipulating objects on learning scientific concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 102(8), 395-399.
  4. Friedrichsen, P., van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358-376.
  5. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
  6. Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Inquiry and technology. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 3-29). Routledge.
  7. Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393-441). Routledge.
  8. Sheraliev S. S. Integrated Technique for Solving Problems in Physics Using MathCad Programs and Crocodile Technology 3D //Eastern European Scientific Journal. – 2016. – №. 4. – С. 105-109.
  9. Sa’dullo S. S. Integrated Technique for Solving Problems in Physics Using MathCad Programs and Crocodile Technology 3D //Eastern European Scientific Journal. – 2017. – №. 4.
  10. Sheraliev S. Significance and Application of Pedagogical Innovations in Physics Teaching //Scienceweb academic papers collection. – 2022.
  11. Suyunboevich S. S., Usmanovich I. D., Tashpulatovich Y. L. How to Solve the Problem in Physics //Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. – 2022. – Т. 7. – С. 348-353.
  12. Шералиев С. С., Турматов Ф. А., Бобожонов Ф. Э. ФИЗИКАНИ ЎҚИТИШДА ЭЛЕКТРОН ЎҚУВ-МЕТОДИК ТАЪМИНОТЛАРНИНГ АҲАМИЯТИ //Интернаука. – 2020. – №. 14-2. – С. 85-87.
  13. Suyunboevich S. S. Factors of organizing physical experiments based on non-traditional technologies //ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. – 2021. – Т. 11. – №. 3. – С. 2610-2614.
  14. Sheraliev S. et al. Electronic learning complex in physics and introduction of the section “Vibrations and Waves” //AIP Conference Proceedings. – AIP Publishing LLC, 2022. – Т. 2432. – №. 1. – С. 030090.