##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 234 Download : 587

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

This scientific article explores the significance of interactive methods in teaching mathematics and their impact on student engagement and learning outcomes. Mathematics education has witnessed a shift from traditional lecture-based approaches to more interactive and student-centered methodologies. This article examines various interactive methods, such as hands-on activities, manipulatives, technology integration, cooperative learning, and problemsolving approaches. It discusses the benefits of incorporating interactive methods in mathematics instruction and provides insights into their effective implementation. The article also addresses potential challenges and offers recommendations for educators to enhance the use of interactive methods in teaching mathematics.

Keywords

interactive methods mathematical education

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Umarova Matlyuba Yusufjanovna. (2023). Interactive Methods in Teaching Mathematics: Enhancing Engagement and Learning Outcomes. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 21, 5–9. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/4069

References

  1. Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing School Mathematics: Traditional and Reform Approaches to Teaching and Their Impact on Student Learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  2. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Early Childhood Mathematics Intervention. Science, 318(5855), 995-996.
  3. Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The Effects of Classroom Mathematics Teaching on Students' Learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (Vol. 2, pp. 371-404). Information Age Publishing.
  4. NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  5. National Research Council. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. National Academies Press.
  6. Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. D. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Information Age Publishing.
  7. Suydam, M. N., & Higgins, J. L. (2015). Mathematics Methods for Elementary and Middle School Teachers (8th ed.). Wiley.
  8. Sheraliev S. S. Integrated Technique for Solving Problems in Physics Using MathCad Programs and Crocodile Technology 3D //Eastern European Scientific Journal. – 2016. – №. 4. – С. 105-109.
  9. Sa’dullo S. S. Integrated Technique for Solving Problems in Physics Using MathCad Programs and Crocodile Technology 3D //Eastern European Scientific Journal. – 2017. – №. 4.
  10. Sheraliev S. Significance and Application of Pedagogical Innovations in Physics Teaching //Scienceweb academic papers collection. – 2022.
  11. Suyunboevich S. S., Usmanovich I. D., Tashpulatovich Y. L. How to Solve the Problem in Physics //Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. – 2022. – Т. 7. – С. 348-353.
  12. Шералиев С. С., Турматов Ф. А., Бобожонов Ф. Э. ФИЗИКАНИ ЎҚИТИШДА ЭЛЕКТРОН ЎҚУВ-МЕТОДИК ТАЪМИНОТЛАРНИНГ АҲАМИЯТИ //Интернаука. – 2020. – №. 14-2. – С. 85-87.
  13. Suyunboevich S. S. Factors of organizing physical experiments based on non-traditional technologies //ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. – 2021. – Т. 11. – №. 3. – С. 2610-2614.
  14. Sheraliev S. et al. Electronic learning complex in physics and introduction of the section “Vibrations and Waves” //AIP Conference Proceedings. – AIP Publishing LLC, 2022. – Т. 2432. – №. 1. – С. 030090.