##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 64 Download : 48

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The main task of modern society, the change in educational policy in general and in the field of teaching speech disciplines are discussed in this article. An analysis of pedagogical practice and the results of special studies suggest that the problem of using these technologies to develop the speech competence of future specialists of non-linguistic universities in the process of teaching
the Russian language has not yet been adequately reflected in the research of scientists. It is also said that many problems in higher education, in particular, the use of pedagogical technologies in teaching the Russian language, are poorly solved in both theoretical and practical aspects

Keywords

educational policy non-linguistic Language

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sayyora Saidjajalova. (2022). Pedagogical technologies for the development of the speech competence of future specialists in non-linguistic universities. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 14, 78–89. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/2864

References

  1. A.S. Belkin, V.V. Nesterov Pedagogical competence. Ekaterinburg, (2003)
  2. N.L. Goncharova, Categories "competence" and "competence" in the modern educational paradigm. Collection of scientific papers of the North Caucasus State Technical University. Series "Humanities.", 5, (2007)
  3. A.V. Khutorskoy, Technology for designing key and subject competencies, Eidos Online Journal, (2005)
  4. L.N. Gorobets, “Pedagogical rhetoric”: theory and practice of teaching non-philological students of rhetorical competence: monograph. - Armavir: Publishing and Publishing Center of ASPU (2007)
  5. L.P. Aksenova, Fundamentals of the rhetorical culture of the teacher. Ekaterinburg (2002)
  6. Appendix No. 2 to the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated August 16, 2001 No. 343 “On the Approval of State Educational Standards of Higher Education”.
  7. V.I. Annushkin, Rhetoric. Introductory course: textbook. M.: Flint; Science, 224 (2018)
  8. Y. V.Vorsina, T. A. Snigireva, To the Issue of the Competence For- mation Criteria, The Education and Science Journal
  9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2012-10-67-78
  10. O. Ukpokodu, Developing Teachers' Cultural Competence: One Teacher Educator's Practice of Unpacking Student Culturelessness, Action in Teacher Education, 432-454, 33 (2012)
  11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2011.627033
  12. K. Cushner, Teacher Education, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Intercultural Competence, (2017)
  13. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483346267.n264
  14. Fritz K. Oser, F. Achtenhagen and U. Renold, Competence Oriented Teacher Training: Old Research Demands and New Pathways, Competence Oriented Teacher Training, Brill Sense (2006)
  15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903374_002
  16. B. Cherednichenko, N. Hooley, T. Kruger, R. Mulraney, The practice of beginning teachers: Identifying competence through case writing in teacher education, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 22 (1997)
  17. DOI:http://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.1997v22n2.3
  18. R. Gillies, Teachers’ and Students’ Verbal Behaviours During Cooperative Learning, The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom, 238-257 (2007)
  19. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_12
  20. John H. Sloan, Understanding McLuhan: Some implications for the speech teacher and critic,
  21. The Speech Teacher, 17, 2 (2009)
  22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03634526809377665
  23. Elizabeth Norwood A rationale for effective teacher education in speech communication, (2009)
  24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03634527509378151
  25. M. Hochmuth, Great teachers of speech, The Speech Teacher, 4(3) (2009) DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03634525509376741
  26. III. Wayland Maxfield Parrish, Great teachers of speech, The Speech Teacher, 4(3) (2009)
  27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03634525509376741
  28. R. K. Tucker, The speech teacher in American industry (2009)
  29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03634526009377092
  30. M. Kinnane, Promoting speech education, (2009)DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03634526609377547
  31. M. Ogilvie, Student teaching in speech (2009)
  32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03634525309376586
  33. A.A.Volkov, The course of Russian rhetoric: a manual for theological educational institutions, Russian linguistic journal, 2(6), 35 (2016)
  34. A.A. Volkov, Theory of rhetorical argumentation, KDU Publishing House (2013)
  35. I.M. Osmolovskaya, Innovation and teaching practice, Public Education, 6, 182-188 (2010)
  36. N.N. Simonenko, Management of educational services using innovative teaching methods, Bulletin of the Pacific State University, 2, 201-206 (2012)
  37. L.V. Cherepanova, Reflective approach in teaching Russian language, Science (2006)
  38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/1995-0640-2017-3-202-215.
  39. Appendix No. 2 to the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of the RUZ dated August 16, 2001 № 343 "On the approval of state educational standards of higher education."