##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 161 Download : 78

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

As for the vocabulary of the langue populaire, linguists almost unanimously speak about the loss of its social marking and the actualization of the stylistic function: "In synchronous terms, it is extremely difficult to accurately distinguish between familiar, vernacular and argotic words and expressions… The choice of a "high" (for example, importuner), "medium" (ennuyer) or "low" (embeter) word in speech may depend not on the cultural level of the subject of speech, but on the role he plays in the communication process and the attitude dictated by the role of the addressee of speech" (Dolinin 1978: 315- 318). Russian Russian is a significant difference between the French vernacular: in Russian literary speech, vernacular units can be used only for the purpose of irony, jokes, conscious stylistic contrast, etc.

Keywords

Vocabulary populaire linguists unanimously

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rustamova Feruzabonu Ilkhomovna. (2022). Vocabulary of the modern French language and its reflection in modern fiction. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 8, 26–29. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/1533

References

  1. Beregovskaya E. M. French argot: evolution in its perception // Philological Sciences, No. 1,1997, pp. 55-65.
  2. Rey, Alain, «La renaissance du dictionnaire de langue française au milieu du XX e siècle: une révolution tranquille », dans Les dictionnaires Le Robert, sous la direction de M. Cormier, A. Francœur, J.-C. Boulanger, Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 2003.
  3. Особое место в анализе словообразовательных средств уделено "самым интересным и известным лучше других арго студентов военного училища Сен-Сир и Политехнической школы" Dauzat 1946, 46-47p.
  4. Pennac D. Au bonheur des ogres. - P.: Gallimard, 2008. - 288 p.
  5. Queneau R. Zazie dans le métro. - P.: Gallimard, 2004. - 190 p.
  6. Mirzaxolmatovna, X. Z. (2021). The role of logical issues in teaching mathematics to primary school pupils. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(5), 465-467.
  7. Rakhimovich, F. I., & Ibrokhimovich, F. J. (2021). The Use of Information Technology in Primary Schools. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2, 7-10.
  8. Хурсанова, З. М., Фозилов, Ж. И., & Давыдова, Е. П. (2021). ВАЖНОСТЬ РАЗВИТИЕ ЛОГИЧЕСКОГО МЫШЛЕНИЯ В ПРЕПОДАВАНИИ МАТЕМАТИКИ УЧАЩИХСЯ НАЧАЛЬНОЙ ШКОЛЫ. Интернаука, (24-1), 87-88.
  9. Фозилов, Ж. И. (2021). СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ МЕТОДЫ И ТЕХНОЛОГИИ ПРЕПОДАВАНИЯ В НАЧАЛЬНОЙ ШКОЛЕ. Студенческий вестник, (1-1), 55-56.
  10. Fozilov, J. I., & Toychiyeva, M. M. (2021). THE ROLE OF MENTAL ARITHMETICS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ATTENTION AND THINKING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Студенческий форум, (12), 101-102.
  11. Ibrokhimovich, F. J. (2022). Teaching Mathematics in Elementary School: Issues and Solutions. Eurasian Journal of Learning and Academic Teaching, 4, 84-87.
  12. Fozilov, J., & Davidova, E. (2020). ON THE FORMATION OF TOLERANCE IN FUTURE PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS. Студенческий форум, (27), 79-81.
  13. Ibrokhimovich, F. J. (2022). The Importance of Mother Tongue and Children's Literature in Primary School. Eurasian Journal of Learning and Academic Teaching, 5, 1-3.
  14. Fozilov, Z., & Sharobidinova, S. (2020). INFLUENCE OF COMPUTERS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF COGNITIVE ABILITIES OF PRIMARY EDUCATION PUPILS. Студенческий вестник, (25-3), 86-88.
  15. Ibrokhimovich, F. J. (2022). Development of Intellectual Abilities of Primary School Students in Mathematics Lessons. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 6, 136-140.
  16. Ibrokhimovich, F. J., & Mirzaxolmatovna, X. Z. (2022). THE MOST IMPORTANT ROLE OF MATHEMATICS IN PRIMARY SCHOOL. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(3), 652-655.
  17. Ibrokhimovich, F. J. (2022). Application Of Some Teaching Methods in Mathematics Lessons in Elementary Grades. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 5, 15-17.
  18. Rakhimovich, F. I., & Ibrokhimovich, F. J. (2022). Methodology of Teaching Arithmetic Practices in Primary School Mathematics. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 7, 5-7.
  19. Mirzaxolmatovna, X. Z., & Ibrokhimovich, F. J. (2022). Methods And Techniques of Teaching in Mathematics Lessons in Primary School and Their Positive and Negative Aspects. The Peerian Journal, 5, 70-73.
  20. Mirzaxolmatovna, X. Z., & Ibrokhimovich, F. J. (2021). DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL THINKING IN THE LESSONS OF MATHEMATICS IN ELEMENTARY CLASSES. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics, Commerce and Educational Management, 8(11), 1-1.
  21. Фозилов, Ж. И., & Давыдова, Е. П. (2020). ВАЖНОСТЬ СОБЛЮДЕНИЯ ГИГИЕНЫ ДЕТЕЙ В НАЧАЛЬНЫХ КЛАССАХ. Студенческий вестник, (30-1), 20-21.
  22. Mirzaxolmatovna, X. Z., Ibrokhimovich, F. J., & Ne'matovna, R. S. (2022). Methodology of Teaching Mathematics in Primary Education. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 7, 81-83.
  23. Фозилов, И. Р., Раимбердиева, Ш. Н., & Хурсанова, З. М. (2021). РАЗВИТИЕ ЛОГИЧЕСКОГО МЫШЛЕНИЯ В НАЧАЛЬНЫХ КЛАССАХ. Интернаука, (24-1), 81-82.
  24. Rakhimovich, F. I. Rakhimovich FH ASPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS IN THE CONDITIONS OF DIGITAL ECONOMY. life, 2(15), 17.
  25. Каримов, Ж. Х., & Фозилов, И. Р. (2020). Управление многостадийными процессами путём оптимизации глобальных целей системы. Universum: технические науки, (3-1 (72)), 16-20.