##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 101 Download : 82

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The poetical discourse has a specific cadenced tune. It is through this all-encompassing tone and symbolism that the craftsman communicates the sentiments, internal encounters, contemplations, psycho-social perspectives on his expressive hero, that is, the aesthetic data that the artist's "I" needs to pass on to the audience (per user). In the article, there is given T.E.Lessing, S.Saporta, B.Larin, E.Koseriu, G.O.Vinokur, L.V.shcherba, V.M.Jirmunskiy, A.A.Potebnya, M.M.Bakhtin, the examination of M P.Brandes, M.I.Kojina and numerous different researchers express their perspectives on the investigation of Linguo-poetics as a different science, just as the examination of the otherworldly and tasteful highlights of the sonnets of the People's Poets of Uzbekistan Azam Uktam and Minhojiddin Mirzo.

Keywords

Workmanship beautiful talk Lingvo poetics degree Lingvo pragmatics word craftsmanship mindfulness

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Butunboeva Tumaris A’zamjonovna. (2021). Poetic Discourse In The Poetry Of Azam Oktam And Minhojiddin Mirzo. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 1, 94–98. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/125

References

  1. Azam Uktam. Heart cries in the first part of the day. From the final expressions of Sheik Muhammad Sadiq Muhammad Yusuf.
  2. Azam Uktam. Perception.
  3. Azam Uktam. Blossoms giggling in autumn.
  4. Azam Uktam. Fortieth spring.
  5. Azam Uktam. Bliss of two universes.
  6. Boltaboev H. Instructive deliberate complex. Efficient investigation in philological research.
  7. Mahmudov N., Nurmonov A. Hypothetical sentence structure of the Uzbek language. Tashkent, 1995, p.8.
  8. Mahmudov N., Khudoyberganova D. Explained word reference of Uzbek language analogies. T., Spirituality, 2013. 320 p.
  9. Mahmudov N. Semantic-syntactic asymmetry in the straightforward sentences of the Uzbek language: Diss. dr of philological sciences. – Tashkent, 1984.
  10. Mahmudov N. Presupposition and discourse. Superb. 1986, No. 6, p.29.
  11. Minhojiddin Mirzo. It's an ideal opportunity to blossom, my nurseries. T., Tafakkur, 2015, 288 p.
  12. Mihojiddin Mirzo. My Star. T., Ghafur Ghulam Publishing House, 2009. 200 p.
  13. Mirzaev I. K. Issues of Lingo-lovely content: conceptual. diss. doc. philology. Science. Tashkent, 1992.
  14. Muhammadjonova G. Linguopoetic investigation of Uzbek verse in the late 80s and mid 90s. diss. doc. philology. science T.,
  15. Muhammadjonova G. Linguopoetic investigation of Uzbek verse in the late 80s and mid 90s: diss. doc. Philology. science. dynamic. - Tashkent, 2004.- 25 p.
  16. Nurmonov A. From innateness to cognizance/Uzbek language and writing, 2009 № 6, 105 p.
  17. Saidxonov M. Artistic content as an informative device. Uzbek language and writing, 2009, № 5, 78-p.
  18. Safarov Sh. Pragmalinguistics - T., 2008.
  19. Hakimov M. Essentials of Uzbek pragmalinguistics. 2013
  20. Xoang F. Semantics of platitudes.: New in foreign writing. XVI, M., 1985, p.399-400.